Skip to main content
. 2016 May;8(5):966–976. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.69

Table 3. Univariate analysis of predictors of lymph node metastases.

Variables Prevalence of lymph node metastases (%) Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) P value
Demographics
   Sex 1.046 (0.491–2.229) 0.906
      Men 29/189 (15.3)
      Women 11/69 (15.9)
   Age at operation (years) 1.092 (0.500–2.384) 0.826
      ≤65 30/197 (15.2)
      >65 10/61 (16.4)
Cancer characteristics
   Cancer length (cm) 2.467 (1.192–5.103) 0.015
      ≤1.75 12/123 (9.8)
      >1.75 28/133 (21.1)
   Cancer width (cm) 2.286 (1.147–4.556) 0.019
      ≤1.45 16/144 (11.1)
      >1.45 24/108 (22.2)
   Tumor volume (cm3) 2.475 (1.240–4.939) 0.010
      ≤1.856 16/148 (10.8)
      >1.856 24/104 (23.1)
   Synchronous esophageal cancers 3.454 (0.792–15.072) 0.099
      Yes 3/8 (7.5)
      No 37/250 (14.8)
   Macroscopic type 0.801 (0.538–1.194) 0.277
      I 12/61 (19.7)
      II 5/29 (17.2)
      III 18/132 (15.8)
      II/I + III 0.883 (0.312–2.497) 0.815
   Depth of invasion
      sm1 9/75 (12.0) 1.463 (0.955–2.242) 0.081
      sm2 8/73 (11.0)
      sm3 23/110 (20.9)
      sm3/sm1+sm2 2.037 (1.029–4.033) 0.041
   Degree of differentiation
      Well 1/5 (20.0) 1.682 (0.877–3.229) 0.118
      Moderate 19/156 (12.2)
      Poor 20/97 (20.6)
      Poor/moderate 1.873 (0.942–3.723) 0.073
   Lymphovascular invasion 6.742 (2.485–18.289) <0.001
      Positive 9/18 (50.0)
      Negative 31/240 (12.9)
Surgical type 0.769 (0.448–1.322) 0.342
   Sweet procedure 26/157 (16.6)
   Ivor-Lewis procedure 8/38 (21.1)
   McKeown procedure 1/12 (8.3)
   Left cervical and left thoracic procedure 0/3 (0)
   Transhiatal procedure 0/4 (0)