Table 1.

Effect of intact and damaged tomato and cotton plants on pheromone-guided flight behavior.

Stim. 1	Stim. 2	Sample size	Flight [%]	Upwind [%]	Source contact [%]	Upwind speed [cm/s] ± SD	Number of contacts ± SD
–	Phero	27	96.3	66.7	51.9	25.8 ± 29.6	1.19 ± 1.71
Tom	Phero	30	93.3	70	63.3	22.7 ± 27.3	1.37 ± 1.56
Tom damaged	Phero	20	80	50	40	24 ± 22.7	0.6 ± 0.99
–	Phero	24	91.7	70.8	50	24 ± 22.7	1.75 ± 2.67
Cot	Phero	23	95.7	60.9	47.8	30.5 ± 23	1 ± 1.38
Cot damaged	Phero	28	92.9	67.9	42.9	25.1 ± 33.6	0.75 ± 1.17

Number of tested individuals and the percentages of male moths, for the experiments shown in Figures 2A,C, which started their flight, showed upwind movement and had source contact; also their upwind speed. The last column represents the number of contacts for all tested males. Stimulus (stim.) 1 and 2 together form the odor plume. Odorants of stimulus 1 were emitted continuously, while stimulus 2 (pheromone) was pulsed. A (−) in stimulus 1 represents the use of a solvent instead of an odorant. SD, standard deviation.

no significant differences within a column to the solvent-pheromone stimulation (p > 0.05, Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni-Holm correction; Number of contacts and upwind speed: Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's multiple comparisons test).

cot, cotton; phero, pheromone; tom, tomato.