Table 2.

Effect of β-caryophyllene, (Z)3-hexenol and linalool on pheromone-guided flight behavior.

Stim. 1	Stim. 2	Sample size	Flight [%]	Upwind [%]	Source contact [%]	Upwind speed [cm/s] ± SD	Number of contacts ± SD
–	Phero	22	90.1	63.6	50	22.6 ± 25.5	1 ± 1.23
car100	Phero	26	88.5	80.8	53.8	28.9 ± 28	1.04 ± 1.22
car300	Phero	32	96.9	68.8	43.8	24.7 ± 33.4	1.09 ± 1.53
–	Phero	25	92	52	44	29.1 ± 21.8	1.16 ± 1.84
Z3-hex100	Phero	27	74.1	44.4	33.3	31.1 ± 28.2	1 ± 1.71
Z3-hex300	Phero	28	75	50	10.7*	30.2 ± 28	0.27 ± 0.93**
–	Phero	34	91.2	67.6	50	15.8 ± 30.2	1.32 ± 1.66
lin100	Phero	32	100	56.3	43.8	16.1 ± 40.4	0.94 ± 1.9
lin300	Phero	54	88.9	46.3	27.8 (*)	23.7 ± 34.5	0.63 ± 1.51*

Number of tested individuals and the percentages of male moths, for the experiments shown in Figures 2B,D, which started their flight, showed upwind movement, and had source contact; also, their upwind speed. The last column includes the number of contacts for all tested males. The stimuli were applied as described in Table 1. SD, standard deviation.

^*Within a column indicate significant differences to the solvent-pheromone stimulation (

^*p < 0.05,

^**p < 0.01,

Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni-Holm correction,

^(*)p < 0.05,

Fisher's exact test, p > 0.025 with Bonferroni-Holm correction; Number of contacts and upwind speed: Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's multiple comparisons test).

car, β-caryophyllene; lin, linalool; phero, pheromone; Z3-hex, (Z)3-hexenol.