Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 25.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2014 May 14;32(30):3780–3786. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.014

Table 2.

Change in the distribution and reductions in cCMV infection by type of maternal infection, 10, 20 and 50 years after introduction of vaccine, assuming mixing pattern III, age-specific duration of infectiousness, 20 year duration of latency, 90% vaccine coverage, 70% vaccine efficacy, 5-year duration of vaccine protection, and different ages at vaccination, United States and Brazil.

Setting Age at
vaccination
Type of
maternal
infection
Distribution (%) of cCMV infections by
type of maternal infection
Reduction (%) in cCMV
infections by type of
maternal infection

Pre-
Vaccination
(Baseline)
Years Post-Vaccination Years Post-Vaccination

10 20 50 10 20 50
United States 12-18
months
Primary 16 12 14 20 39 35 21
Reinfection 12 8 8 7 43 50 62
Reactivation 72 80 79 72 4 13 35
Overall 100 14 21 36

15-19
years
Primary 16 16 17 17 18 16 14
Reinfection 12 12 12 11 17 19 21
Reactivation 72 72 72 71 15 17 19
Overall 100 16 17 18

12-18
months +
Primary 16 11 14 22 49 44 29
Reinfection 12 8 7 7 53 58 69
15-19
years
Reactivation 72 81 79 72 17 25 45
Overall 100 27 32 45

20-29
years
Primary 16 18 18 18 27 24 23
Reinfection 12 12 12 12 32 32 32
Reactivation 72 71 70 70 32 32 32
Overall 100 31 30 31

12-18
months
Primary 15 13 20 25 32 1 −24
Brazil Reinfection 38 28 27 27 46 49 48
Reactivation 47 59 53 48 5 17 24
Overall 100 25 27 26

15-19
years
Primary 15 15 16 16 31 26 24
Reinfection 38 38 37 37 34 34 35
Reactivation 47 48 47 47 30 32 32
Overall 100 32 32 32

12-18
months +
Primary 15 13 22 29 53 23 −3
Reinfection 38 27 25 25 64 66 66
15-19
years
Reactivation 47 60 53 47 32 41 47
Overall 100 48 48 47

Footnote: Results for age at vaccination of 20-29 years not shown for Brazil because this scenario would lead to the least reduction in cCMV infections.