Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 20;10(10):943–957. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1084462

Table 2.

Summary of location and enrichment of cell subset- and sex-specific DMGs

DMRs Promoter Gene body Enhancer CGIs Open sea
Immune cell subset-specific DMRs 16% versus 25% of total CpG sites (reduced) 42% versus 33% of total CpG sites (enriched) 75% versus 64% of total CpG sites (enriched) 7% versus 31% of total CpG sites (reduced) 55% versus 36% of total CpG sites (enriched)
  % DMGs of negatively correlated DEG-DMG pairs 27% 47%      
  % DMGs of positively correlated DEG-DMG pairs 12% 70%      
Sex-specific DMGs 20% versus 25% of total CpG sites (reduced) 36% versus 33% of total CpG sites (no change) 60% versus 64% of total CpG sites (no change) 38% versus 31% of total CpG sites (enriched) 31% versus 36% of total CpG sites (reduced)

Percentage of DMGs in a specific location, compared to the total CpG sites scanned by the chip in the location. We defined a difference ≥ 5% as enrichment or reduction.

Percentage of DMGs in the promoter or gene body out of correlated DEG-DMG pairs (other locations not included)