Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 29;4(2):225–239. doi: 10.3390/plants4020225

Table 3.

Yield of barley lpa near-isogenic lines and three cultivar controls when grown in five locations in Idaho, 2010. Data represent means of four replicates at each location.

Isoline Pair Genotype Idaho Location Line Mean
Aberdeen Ashton Idaho Falls Rupert Soda Springs
Grain Yield (Mg·ha−1)
1 WT 6.04 2.52 6.15 6.20 2.13 4.61
1 Hvlpa1-1 6.61 2.78 6.57 5.47 2.00 4.69
2 WT 5.83 2.37 5.84 6.20 2.22 4.49
2 Hvlpa3-1 6.17 2.03 5.71 5.15 1.88 4.19
3 WT 5.72 2.59 5.98 5.45 2.80 4.60
3 Hvlpa-M955 5.27 1.88 5.71 4.74 1.47 3.81
4 WT 6.48 2.34 6.15 5.89 2.41 4.91
4 Hvlpa2-1 6.51 2.59 5.98 5.23 1.81 3.86
5 WT 6.14 2.32 6.45 5.71 2.52 4.63
5 Hvlpa4-1 6.06 2.30 6.74 5.45 1.96 4.50
6 WT 6.59 2.30 6.77 5.89 2.10 4.73
6 Hvlpa-M640 6.30 2.40 6.45 4.44 1.61 3.58
Cultivar Controls
Harrington 6.38 2.42 5.54 5.54 2.22 4.42
Baronesse 7.17 3.57 6.81 7.45 2.59 5.52
Conrad 7.06 2.37 6.08 6.91 2.05 4.89
Location Mean ± SE 6.29 ± 0.34 2.43 ± 0.21 6.19 ± 0.29 5.78 ± 0.22 2.10 ± 0.19 4.52 ± 0.22
LSD p = 0.05 0.98 0.59 0.83 0.63 0.55 0.64