Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 25;30(34):11493–11500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1550-10.2010

Table 1.

Cell characteristics of layer V pyramidal neurons of rats trained in the RI task and behavioral controls

Training group Number of subjects Number of cells AMPA/NMDA Series resistance (MΩ) Input resistance (MΩ) Membrane capacitance (pF) Holding current (pA)
Prelimbic
    RI task 6 16 1.21 ± 0.09 7.1 ± 0.6 53.0 ± 3.5 45.2 ± 2.4 655.0 ± 38.8
    Operant control 5 15 0.70 ± 0.08 6.3 ± 0.7 52.5 ± 6.0 53.4 ± 3.6 638.8 ± 85.9
    Yoked control 4 12 0.76 ± 0.07 6.9 ± 0.8 55.4 ± 5.9 49.8 ± 4.2 637.1 ± 68.1
    Weight control 5 11 0.72 ± 0.07 5.4 ± 0.5 48.2 ± 3.9 59.9 ± 8.3 595.1 ± 52.1
    Age control 6 16 0.69 ± 0.05 5.4 ± 0.2 55.0 ± 6.0 54.5 ± 2.4 605.1 ± 67.0
Infralimbic
    RI task 5 11 0.74 ± 0.09 6.6 ± 0.7 72.1 ± 11.0 48.1 ± 6.3 537.9 ± 70.8
    Operant control 5 13 0.75 ± 0.06 8.3 ± 1.3 73.1 ± 7.6 41.3 ± 3.6 449.8 ± 39.7
    Yoked control 4 7 0.76 ± 0.10 8.2 ± 1.1 101.5 ± 7.7 43.7 ± 5.5 366.4 ± 89.2
    Weight control 4 10 0.83 ± 0.08 6.6 ± 0.6 61.6 ± 6.6 45.1 ± 2.4 550.9 ± 117.9
    Age control 4 12 0.75 ± 0.07 5.5 ± 0.2 48.1 ± 3.5 48.1 ± 3.5 579.3 ± 90.2

Values were obtained with a 10 ms, +10 mV pulse while holding neurons at +40 mV. No significant differences between experimental groups were observed for any variable, with the exception of AMPA/NMDA (bolded).