Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2016 Mar 21;52(5):704–716. doi: 10.1037/dev0000111

Table 2.

Child Language Measures by Skill Group: Descriptive Statistics and Pair-wise Variance Covariance Matrix

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
15 months
 1. CDI Comprehension 1.00/1.00 .43 .35 .29 .19 .09 .00 −.02 −.01 .11
 2. CDI Production .46 1.02/1.02 .38 .47 .48 .17 −.05 −.06 −.08 .03
 3. CDI Early Gestures .46 .30 1.00/1.00 .23 .11 .11 −.01 −.04 −.12 .04
25 months
 4. CDI Production .37 .31 .38 1.00/1.00 .68 .33 .30 .13 .05 .11
 5. CDI Sentence Complexity .41 .25 .34 .57 1.00/1.00 .31 .24 .05 .01 −.01
 6. Bayley Language Factor .28 .30 .21 .45 .43 1.01/1.00 .09 −.01 .02 .03
5 Years
 7. PPVT-III .06 .12 .10 .33 .19 .45 1.01/1.00 .27 .48 .27
 8. WJ Letter-Word Identification .09 .05 −.02 .16 .06 .08 .32 1.01/1.00 .24 .25
11Years
 9. PPVT-III .22 .05 .16 .46 .30 .25 .31 .08 1.01/1.00 .52
 10. ECLS-K Language/Literacy .09 .01 .04 .26 .31 .10 .29 .32 .40 1.00/1.00

M
 Low skill 47.13 10.81 14.22 48.45 6.86 6.01 77.23 84.40 74.76 94.01
 Average-to-high skill 51.18 14.32 14.48 66.40 12.38 9.62 105.88 98.44 113.27 160.81
SD
 Low skill 18.83 11.48 2.01 21.96 8.37 3.38 11.65 13.22 7.26 21.95
 Average-to-high skill 17.01 12.37 1.92 19.93 9.00 2.17 11.65 12.43 8.36 8.58
Range
 Low skill group 2–89 0–57 8–18 1–100 0–37 0–12 40–103 46–114 40–84 31.51–122.38
 Average-to-high skill 14–89 0–64 8–18 13–100 0–37 0–12 73–135 68–133 100–138 143.48–180.65
Effect size for mean comparisons .01 .04 .01 .17 .12 .32 .60 .23 .86 .88

Note. Covariances shown below the diagonal were from children of low language skill; those above the diagonal were from children of average-to-high language skill. Variances shown before the slash are from children of low language skill; those after the slash are from children of average-to-high language skill. All variables are scaled by constants so that variables’ variances were ≈1.

Reported effect size is partial eta squared; values of .01, .06, and .14 are considered small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively (Cohen, 1988).