To develop appropriate DD-CIK allocation strategies |
Priority for DD-CIK could be assigned between local pediatric candidates and local mismatched adults |
To develop appropriate living donor allocation strategies |
Living donor kidneys resulting from DD CIK chains should be allocated to the waiting list according to the existing deceased donor allocation protocol. |
To resolve logistical barriers to allocation given the existence of multiple KPD Registries |
Provides variances for one or more of the current registries to implement this strategy. |
To prepare strategies to handle chains that unravel |
Could be modeled after strategies developed by existing registries such as using CIKs to repair ongoing chains (3), or a KPD registry could be asked to end the next chain to the DD list. |
To allocate and use living donor kidneys in a timely manner |
Participating patients and donors must be completely prepared for surgery and fully informed of the additional risks associated with chains such as the potential for them to unravel. |
To assess added benefit to the entire waiting list of using a kidney as DD CIK |
One year after implementation of a trial the number and characteristics of the patients transplanted and their donors should be reviewed. The quality of the grafts could be compared using a living donor risk index analogous to the current deceased donor kidney risk index. |
The limited number of participants in KPD registries and limited number of willing and healthy living donors. |
Push forward adoption of best practices for both KPD and living donation as advocated by national consensus conferences in 2012 (13) and 2014 respectively. (16) |