Table 1.

Means (and standard deviations) for morality, competence and sociability information and statistics of repeated measures ANOVAs (Study 2).

Target variable	Morality	Competence	Sociability	F, p, and ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ values
Perceived pervasiveness over time	6.24a (1.91)	5.86b (2.01)	5.19c (2.06)	F(2,298) = 28.86, p < 0.001; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.09
	Pairwise comparisons: M vs. C: p = 0.03; M vs. S: p < 0.001; C vs. S: p < 0.001
Importance and centrality for the self	7.39a (1.04)	7.21b (1.33)	6.76c (1.51)	F(2,298) = 87.93, p < 0.001; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.23
	Pairwise comparisons: M vs. C: p < 0.001; M vs. S: p < 0.001; C vs. S: p < 0.001
Importance and centrality in the eyes of others	7.76a (1.19)	7.09b (1.45)	6.64c (1.64)	F(2,298) = 83.60, p < 0.001; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.22
	Pairwise comparisons: M vs. C: p < 0.001; M vs. S: p < 0.001; C vs. S: p < 0.001
Indicative of true nature	7.18a (1.64)	5.29b (1.88)	5.51b (2.04)	F(2,298) = 106.67, p < 0.001; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.26
	Pairwise comparisons: M vs. C: p < 0.001; M vs. S: p < 0.001; C vs. S: p = 0.37
Predictive of future behavior	7.05a (1.63)	5.57b (1.72)	5.53b (2.01)	F(2,297) = 89.78, p < 0.001; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.23
	Pairwise comparisons: M vs. C: p < 0.001; M vs. S: p < 0.001; C vs. S: p = 0.26
Requiring effort to repair	5.64a (1.37)	4.32b (1.14)	–	F(1,298) = 242.44, p < 0.001; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.45
Anticipated ingroup respect	3.49a (1.29)	4.52b (1.32)	–	F(1,295) = 172.09, p < 0.001; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.37

Different superscripts in raw indicate a significant difference at least at p < 0.05. Pairwise comparisons were performed with Bonferroni tests. For the last two variables the comparison was between morality and competence information.