Table 1. Test results for power-law distribution*.
| Parameters | Species | n | p-value | Goodness of fits | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole network | Clustering coefficient | C. elegans | 39 | 0.766 | 0.1114992 |
| Cat | 22 | ~0.11 | 0.2635055 | ||
| Monkey | 20 | 0.1344 | 0.1564396 | ||
| Human | 59 | 0.12 | 0.238144 | ||
| Neighborhood connectivity | C. elegans | 36 | 0.8328 | 0.1372943 | |
| Cat | 25 | 0.62 | 0.1514593 | ||
| Monkey | 24 | 0.3804 | 0.2047339 | ||
| Human | 59 | 0.6968 | 0.07790939 | ||
| Degree distribution | C. elegans | 277 | 0.5568 | 0.04458331 | |
| Cat | 51 | 0.1132 | 0.1160309 | ||
| Monkey | 71 | 0.1084 | 0.1052469 | ||
| Human | 168 | 0.168 | 0.07514285 | ||
| Data set after scaling from all levels | Clustering coefficient | C. elegans | 318 | 0.1752 | 0.1017557 |
| Cat | 70 | 0.6064 | 0.08411472 | ||
| Monkey | 113 | 0.4284 | 0.07989214 | ||
| Human | 308 | 0.7112 | 0.04166865 | ||
| Neighborhood connectivity | C. elegans | 351 | 0.2192 | 0.05529387 | |
| Cat | 70 | 0.32 | 0.08908077 | ||
| Monkey | 124 | 0.1976 | 0.1044134 | ||
| Human | 310 | 0.8816 | 0.04186619 | ||
| Degree distribution | C. elegans | 361 | 0.2876 | 0.06655764 | |
| Cat | 69 | 0.115 | 0.1035658 | ||
| Monkey | 124 | 0.6324 | 0.08231645 | ||
| Human | 310 | 0.5048 | 0.05792419 | ||
| Betweenness centrality | C. elegans | 264 | 0.3384 | 0.0652874 | |
| Cat | 61 | 0.1148 | 0.1140632 | ||
| Monkey | 98 | 0.3816 | 0.07636612 | ||
| Human | 254 | 0.2776 | 0.07253436 | ||
| Closeness centrality | C. elegans | 364 | 0.1728 | 0.1119073 | |
| Cat | 71 | ~0.1 | 0.172004 | ||
| Monkey | 107 | 0.2084 | 0.1183037 | ||
| Human | 280 | 0.1384 | 0.08605586 | ||
| Eigenvector centrality | C. elegans | 340 | 0.608 | 0.08864998 | |
| Cat | 71 | 0.26 | 0.1180827 | ||
| Monkey | 123 | 0.5508 | 0.1134687 | ||
| Human | 299 | 0.1708 | 0.08715249 |
*Values calculated against 2500 random sampling.