Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2014 Apr 4;135(9):2157–2172. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28854

Table 1.

Selected characteristics including occupational exposure assessment of the 13 studies in the CLIC pooled analyses of parental occupational pesticide exposure and the risk of leukemia in the offspring

Country, Study
(years of case
accrual)
Method of
occupational
assessment
Case Control Time period(s) of interesta Scope of
assessment
Final
exposure
variableb
Prevalence of ‘High
likelihood of
pesticide exposure’
amongst controls
Source of
conversion tool to
other Occupational
Classifications
(where applicable)

Source Participationc Nd Source Participationc Nd Mothers Fathers
1. Use of an Occupational Classification System
France, ADELE (1993–1999) ISCO 1988 Hospitals 95% ALL: 240
AML:
36
Hospitals (same as cases) 99% 288 Extracted from work history (start & end year of each job)
1. Main year before conception (defined as the year of the mid point of the year before conception)
2. Main year of pregnancy (defined as the year of the midpoint of the pregnancy)
All jobs held in time periods 4 level
1. ‘High likelihood of pesticide exposure’
2. ‘Moderate likelihood of exposure’
3. ‘Limited likelihood of exposure’
4 = ‘No or minimal likelihood of pesticide exposure’
0.4 1.7 Correspondence Table ISCO 08 to ISCO 8819
Greece, NARECHEM (1993–1994) ISCO 1988 Nationwide hospital cancer registry 100% ALL; 140
AML: 13
Hospital 96% 300 1.One year before birth
2.During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods As above 2.9 9.8 Correspondence Table ISCO 08 to ISCO 8819
France ESCALE (2003–2004) ISCO 1968 Population-based cancer registry (nationwide) 91% ALL: 648
AML: 101
Population quotas by age, sex, region (nationwide) 71% 1681 1.During pregnancye Main job in time period As above 0.8 4.3 Correspondence Table ISCO 68 to ISCO 8820
Greece, NARECHEM (1996–2010) ISCO 1968 Nationwide hospital cancer registry 83% ALL:
964
AML:
113
Hospital 96% 1085 1. One year before birth
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods As above 1.1 3.0 Correspondence Table ISCO 68 to ISCO 8820
Germany, GCCR (1988–1994)
Germany, Bundesgentur fur Abeit Wirtschaftsklasse 1988 Population-based cancer registry (nationwide) 82% ALL: 751
AML:
130
Population-based registry (community based but complete nationwide coverage) 71% 2458 1. Conception
2. During pregnancy
Main job in time periods As above 1.2 3.0 Correspondence Table to ISCO 88 obtained from Federal Statistical Office, Germany21
UK, UKCCS (1991–1996) UK, Standard Occupational Classification 1990 Population-based tailored referral systems 93% ALL: 1461
AML: 248
GP registries (nationwide) 64% 3448 1. Around conception
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods As above 0.3 2.4 Correspondence Table to ISCO 88 obtained from Office for National Statistics, UK22
US, NCCLS (1995–2008) US, Census Occupational
Classification Codes,1990
Hospitals 86% ALL: 840
AML: 145
Birth registry (state wide) 68% 1226 Extracted from work history (start and end month, year of each job)
1. Year before conception
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods As above 2.0 8.3 Correspondence Tables obtained from the National Crosswalk Center23 between 1990 Census to 2000 Census codes and 2000 Census codes to ISCO 88
US, COG-E15 (1989–1993) US, Department of Labor Dictionary of Occupational Titles (4th ed., rev. 1991) Children’s Cancer Group clinical trials 87% ALL: 1914 RDD 70% 1987 Extracted from work history (start and end month, year of each job)
1. Year before conception
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods As above 1.1 4.2 Correspondence Tables obtained from the National Crosswalk Center23 between DOT to 2000 Census codes and 2000 Census codes to ISCO 88
2. Pesticide exposure already assigned
Australia, Aus-ALL (2003–2007) Answers to initial structured questionnaire and follow-up job specific interview reviewed by expert14 Hospitals (nationwide) 75% ALL: 389 RDD 64% of agreed controls 876 1. One year before birth All jobs held in time period 3 level:
1 = medium/high exposure
2 = low exposure
4 = not exposed
0.2 5.5
Canada, Quebec (1980–2000) Answers to initial structured interview and follow-up job specific questions reviewed by expert12, 16 Hospitals (province wide) 93% ALL: 790 Health Insurance file population-based registry (province-wide) 86% 790 1. Two years before conception
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods 2 level:
1 = exposed
4 = not exposed
4.4 7.9
Italy, SETIL (1998–2001) Answers to initial structured interview and follow-up job specific questions reviewed by experts24 (restricted to agricultural pesticides) Nationwide clinical database 91% ALL: 601
AML: 32
Population-based National Health Service Registry 69% 1044 1. One year before conception
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods 2 level:
1 = exposed
4 = not exposed
0.4 1.9
New Zealand, NZCCS (1990–1993) Exposure assignment based on detailed questionnaire and interview about pesticide exposures in each job Registry (nationwide) 92% ALL: 97
AML: 22
Birth registry (nationwide) 69% 303 1. Two years before birth
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods 2 level:
1 = exposed
4 = not exposed
1.3 18.0
3. Pesticide exposure data collected, but exposure not assigned
US, COG-E14 (1988–1993) Detailed questionnaire about each type of pesticide use in each job Children’s Cancer Group clinical trials 76% AML: 517 RDD 72% 610 Extracted from work history (start and end month, year of each job)
1. Year before conception
2. During pregnancy
All jobs held in time periods 4 level:
Tertiles of exposuref

1 = ‘High’
2 = ‘Medium’
3 = ‘Low’
4 = unexposed
0.3 5.2
a

The time periods of interest were 1. Around conception for the father and 2. During pregnancy for the mother.

b

In the final pooling process, a 4 level variable was used, but levels 2 and or 3 were empty for studies with less than 4 categories.

c

Participation fractions are based on information available from published studies or obtained directly from study personnel. Definition of the participation fraction may vary across studies.

d

Occupational histories were available for more than 90% of parents. The numbers of mothers and fathers with occupational histories are in Supplementary Table 2.

e

In France ESCALE, paternal exposure during pregnancy was used as a proxy for paternal exposure at conception as these data were not available.

f

Based on tertiles of the total time any pesticide was in the air the subject or on the skin/clothing during time period among exposed control mothers and fathers.

ISCO: International Standard Classification for Occupation

RDD: random digit dialing