Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 10;4(12):e002435. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002435

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariable Cox Regression Models for All HRT Recipients

Univariate Cox Models Final Multivariable Model
Hazard Ratio 95% CI P Value Hazard Ratio 95% CI P Value
Heart retransplant
With concurrent KT (HRT‐KT) 0.63 0.45–0.87 0.006 0.50 0.33–0.76 0.001
Without KT (HRT alone) 1.00 1.00
Recipient age 1.01 1.00–1.01 <0.001
Status 1A 1.61 1.39–1.87 <0.001 1.28 1.04–1.58 0.021
Days spent on wait‐list 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.036
Years since first transplant 0.94 0.92–0.95 <0.001 0.98 0.95–1.00 0.032
eGFR <30 or on dialysis 1.69 1.41–2.02 <0.001 1.87 1.53–2.30 <0.001
ECMO support 2.62 1.87–3.66 <0.001 1.89 1.15–3.12 0.013
Mechanical ventilation 1.87 1.55–2.25 <0.001
Donor age 1.01 1.00–1.01 0.001 1.01 1.01–1.02 0.001
Donor inotrope use 0.70 0.59–0.82 <0.001
Heart ischemic time 1.07 1.01–1.14 0.032 1.18 1.09–1.28 <0.001
Era of heart retransplant
1987–1995 1.00 1.00
1996–2000 0.65 0.55–0.78 <0.001 0.68 0.53–0.88 0.003
2001–2005 0.51 0.42–0.62 <0.001 0.53 0.40–0.70 <0.001
2006–2011 0.47 0.38–0.59 <0.001 0.57 0.42–0.78 0.001

All variables included in this table had univariate P<0.10 and were considered for the preliminary multivariable model. The final multivariable model was reduced to all variables with P<0.05. ECMO indicates extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HRT, heart retransplant; KT, kidney transplant; Status 1A, highest wait‐list urgency status.