Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 17;6(1):83–90. doi: 10.15171/apb.2016.013

Table 2. Particle size and zeta potential of nanosuspensions prepared by a) HPH process (First generation approach) and b) H96 process (Lyophilization + HPH) .

Formulation Particle size (nm) PDI ZP (mV)
a) Particle size and zeta potential of nanosuspensions prepared by HPH process (First generation approach)
NCH1 516.2 0.293 -18.60
NCH2 443.2 0.218 -22.93
NCH3 433.1 0.288 -36.79
NCH4 373.9 0.306 -23.26
NCH5 351.0 0.278 -29.26
NCH6 840.9 0.331 -13.90
NCH7 815.8 0.294 -25.10
NCH8 890.7 0.298 -25.80
NCH9 784.6 0.269 -21.80
NCH10 840.0 0.256 -22.80
NCH11 960.2 0.227 -2.20
NCH12 1011.9 0.594 -6.61
NCH13 1169.4 0.369 -1.92
NCH14 1339.3 0.321 -2.37
NCH15 1502.9 0.341 -8.21
NCH16 1132.6 0.243 -8.41
NCH17 870.5 0.252 -6.21
NCH18 763.8 0.215 -4.08
NCH19 698.2 0.189 -13.64
NCH20 678.2 0.165 -10.22
NCH21 320.4 0.266 -28.80
NCH22 526.2 0.293 -15.10
NCH23 510.5 0.272 -16.92
b) Particle size and zeta potential of nanosuspensions prepared by H96 process (second generation approach)
NCLH1 89.1 0.288 -20.60
NCLH2 125.1 0.141 -16.93
NCLH3 260.6 0.274 -5.79
NCLH4 178.7 0.255 -6.26
NCLH5 35.78 0.257 -23.2
NCLH6 126.5 0.181 -13.90
NCLH7 110.8 0.159 -18.10