Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;11(4):e0154258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154258

Table 4. Comparison of HRU between IBS-C patients and IBS patients without constipation.

Unadjusted IRRsa (95% CIs) Adjusted IRRsa (95% CIs)
Medical Procedures and Diagnostic Tests
    Colonoscopy 1.43 (1.41–1.45) 1.42 (1.40–1.44)
    CT scan 1.80 (1.75–1.84) 1.63 (1.59–1.67)
    Ultrasound 1.50 (1.47–1.53) 1.35 (1.32–1.38)
    Anorectal Function Testing 3.67 (3.41–3.96) 4.14 (3.84–4.46)
Pharmacy prescriptions for treating constipation or diarrhea 3.27 (3.17–3.38) 3.42 (3.31–3.53)
Medical Visits
    Intestinal-Related IP Admissions 2.19 (2.10–2.28) 1.91 (1.84–1.99)
    Intestinal-Related ER Visits 3.55 (3.42–3.69) 3.19 (3.08–3.32)
    GI Specialist Visits 1.61 (1.58–1.64) 1.55 (1.52–1.57)

Note:

a An IRR > 1 indicates that IBS-C patients had higher HRU compared to IBS patients without constipation; while an IRR < 1 indicates that IBS-C patients had lower HRU compared to IBS patients without constipation. All p<0.001.

Abbreviations: CIs: confidence intervals. CT: computed tomography; ER: emergency room; GI: gastrointestinal; HRU, healthcare resource utilization; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation; IP: inpatient; IRR: incidence rate ratio.