Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;10(4):e0004649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004649

Table 6. Association analysis using Fisher’s exact test between human demographics data (gender and age) and selected variables from a survey of dog-owners conducted in the Northern Peninsula Area (NAP), Australia in 2015.

A liberal significance level of 0.1 was used to determine significant associations.

Human Gender Human Age
M F Total OR P- Value Young Old Total OR P-value
Dog roaming
 Yes 17 1 18 5 13 18
 No 8 5 13 4 9 13
 Total 25 6 31 9.8 0.0592 9 22 31 0.87 1
Human mediated movement
 Yes 16 0 16 3 9 12
 No 9 6 15 6 13 19
 Total 25 6 31 N/A3 0.0072 9 22 31 0.73 1
Movement restriction
 Yes 21 6 27 9 18 27
 No 4 0 4 0 4 4
 Total 25 6 31 0 0.56 9 22 31 N/A 0.3
Disease restriction
 Yes 23 6 29 9 20 29
 No 2 0 2 0 2 2
 Total 25 6 31 0 1 9 22 31 N/A 1
Veterinary visit
 Yes 17 6 24 7 16 24
 No 7 0 7 2 5 7
 Total 24 6 301 0 0.29 9 21 301 1.09 1
Needle in life
 Yes 16 5 21 5 16 21
 No 8 1 9 4 5 9
 Total 24 6 301 0.41 0.64 9 21 301 0.4 0.39
Picture A
 Yes 21 6 27 9 18 27
 No 4 0 4 0 4 4
 Total 25 6 31 0 0.56 9 22 31 N/A 0.3
Picture B
 Yes 24 6 30 9 21 30
 No 1 0 1 0 1 1
 Total 25 6 31 0 1 9 22 31 N/A 1
Picture E
 Yes 1 0 30 0 1 1
 No 24 6 1 9 21 30
 Total 25 6 31 N/A 1 9 22 31 0 1
Sick in last 12 months
 Yes 9 3 12 6 6 12
 No 16 3 19 3 16 19
 Total 25 6 31 0.57 0.65 9 22 31 5.01 0.062
How long until report
 Within a week 19 3 22 5 17 22
 More than a week 2 2 4 2 2 4
 Total 21 5 261 5.72 0.15 7 19 261 3.11 0.29
Bitten by dog
 Yes 2 0 2 0 2 2
 No 23 6 29 9 20 29
 Total 25 6 31 N/A 1 9 22 31 0 1
Dog bitten by dog
 Yes 17 2 19 5 14 19
 No 8 4 12 4 8 12
 Total 25 6 31 4.04 0.17 9 22 31 0.72 0.7
Number of dogs above median (2)
 Yes 11 2 19 4 9 13
 No 14 4 22 5 12 17
 Total 25 6 31 1.54 1 9 22 31 1.06 1

1 Some respondents replied with “I’m not sure” which was excluded, leading to the variation in totals.

2 Indicates association was considered significant

3 N/A = odds ratio was calculated as infinity