Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;11(4):e0154027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154027

Table 3. Analysis of the agronomic traits of 6 homozygous T2 mutant lines.

Mutant lines Plant height (cm) Flag leaf length (cm) Flag leaf width (mm) No. of productive panicles Panicle length (cm) No. of grainsper panicle Seed setting rate (%) Thousand seed weight (g)
WT 59.8±1.9a 26.2±3.2a 13.6±0.5a 9.0±1.0a 12.4±1.0a 69.6±3.2a 90.0±1.1a 26.3±0.3a
KS2-12-1-3 60.1±1.5a 26.8±3.3a 13.4±0.5a 9.2±1.3a 12.9±1.4a 71.2±2.8a 90.2±1.5a 26.2±0.3a
KS2-27-4-1 59.8±2.4a 27.2±2.9a 13.6±1.1a 9.4±1.5a 12.6±0.7a 69.2±3.0a 89.0±0.8a 26.5±0.3a
KS2-45-6-1 60.8±1.6a 25.4±1.9a 13.8±0.8a 9.2±1.4a 12.7±1.6a 67.8±3.1a 89.1±1.9a 26.1±0.1a
KS2-70-1-2 60.0±2.1a 25.8±1.6a 13.6±1.2a 9.4±1.6a 13.0±0.5a 68.8±3.7a 88.4±0.5a 26.2±0.2a
KS2-75-1-11 59.2±1.9a 26.4±3.6a 13.8±0.9a 9.2±1.5a 12.3±0.9a 71.8±2.8a 89.4±0.9a 26.4±0.3a
KS2-144-1-2 59.6±1.7a 25.2±3.3a 13.6±1.3a 9.4±1.7a 12.5±0.5a 69.0±2.4a 89.8±1.1a 26.3±0.2a

The results are shown for five mutant plants of each mutant line and are represented as the mean ± SE. The values marked with the same letter (a) are non-significantly different (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test).