Table 3. The influence of the periodontal status on incident type 2 diabetes in modified Poisson regression analysis.
Adjusted Relative Risk for incident diabetes (95% confidence interval) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
Independent Variables | A | B | A | B |
Prediabetes | ‒ | 5.89 (4.06 ‒ 8.56)‡ | ‒ | 5.94 (4.08 ‒ 8.63)‡ |
(reference: no prediabetes) | ||||
Gingival hemorrhage | 1.32 (0.95 ‒ 1.85) | 1.23 (0.90 ‒ 1.70) | ‒ | ‒ |
(reference: no gingival hemorrhage) | ||||
Tooth loosening | ‒ | ‒ | 1.73 (1.14 ‒ 2.64)* | 1.73 (1.18 ‒ 2.53)† |
(reference: no tooth loosening) |
*: P<0.05
†: P<0.01
‡: P<0.001.
BMI: body mass index. Model 1 used gingival hemorrhage as an oral status indicator. Model 2 used tooth loosening as an oral status indicator. A: not including prediabetes as a covariate. B: including prediabetes as a covariate. The other covariate consisted of age, current smoking habits, BMI, family history of diabetes, hypertension, alcohol heavy consumption (≥ 40 g/day), and exercise habits (> 30 minutes, ≥ 2 days/week).