Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 18;9:2287–2295. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S97583

Table 3.

Cox regression hazard model to predict the effect on OS

Category HR 95% CI P-value
Patient age (years) 0.026
 ≤35 0.961 0.285–3.238 0.949
 36–50 0.136 0.032–0.583 0.007
 >50
Tumor size (mm) 0.016
 ≤20 0.123 0.029–0.516 0.004
 21–50 0.478 0.176–1.296 0.147
 >50
Cancer stage 0.002
 DCIS 0.000 0.000–6.264E+296 0.971
 I 0.050 0.006–0.387 0.004
 II 0.277 0.124–0.619 0.002
 III
LN status 0.003
 0 0.188 0.070–0.507 0.001
 1–3 0.727 0.271–1.955 0.528
 ≥4
Histologic grade 0.296
 I–II 0.000 0.000–6.264E+296 0.981
 II–III 0.439 0.512–1.631 0.124
 III 1.212 0.480–2.296 0.744
 Unknown and DCIS
Embolus 1.238 0.445–3.443 0.682
Chemotherapy 0.851
 No 2001.174 0.075–2.718E+87 0.936
 Anthracycline-based 2727.280 0.131–3.9E+87 0.933
 Taxane 3573.678 0.190–5.056E+87 0.931
 Others
History of mother suffered BC 1.943 0.263–14.378 0.515
Menopause 0.431 0.180–1.033 0.059
Sex hormone receptor 1.050 0.476–2.316 0.905
Endocrine therapy 0.677 0.280–1.636 0.386
Radiotherapy 0.720 0.323–1.604 0.422
Ki-67 (%)
 ≤14 0.581 0.162–2.082 0.404
 >14
BMI (kg/m2) 0.417
 <18.5 0.851 0.112–6.473 0.876
 18.5–23.9 0.578 0.256–1.304 0.187
 ≥24

Abbreviations: BC, breast cancer; BMI, body mass index; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; HR, hazard ratio; LN, lymph node; OS, overall survival.