Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;89(1060):20150842. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150842

Table 3.

Comparison of metrics between prevalence levels: hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR) or rate ratio (RR), as appropriate, with 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value

Metric Measure 20% vs 50% prevalence
80% vs 50% prevalence
Effect size (95% CI) p-value Effect size (95% CI) p-value
Time to first pursuit HR 1.32 (0.95–1.93) 0.14 0.95 (0.64–1.40) 0.79
Total assessment time span HR 0.74 (0.50–1.12) 0.15 0.83 (0.56–1.24) 0.37
Assessment pursuit time OR 1.27 (0.87–1.84) 0.22 0.90 (0.62–1.32) 0.60
Assessment pursuit rate RR 0.91 (0.70–1.18) 0.47 1.07 (0.83–1.37) 0.60
Pursuit rate RR 1.01 (0.98–1.05) 0.39 1.03 (1.00–1.07) 0.06
Screen coverage
 Upper OR 0.93 (0.78–1.12) 0.45 1.28 (1.07–1.53) 0.007
 Central OR 1.06 (0.92–1.23) 0.39 0.82 (0.72–0.95) 0.008
 Lower OR 0.96 (0.81–1.13) 0.63 1.11 (0.94–1.31) 0.22
Total number of identifications RR 0.81 (0.62–1.06) 0.12 1.04 (0.81–1.34) 0.75
Any correct identification OR 0.24 (0.08–0.73) 0.01 0.37 (0.12–1.11) 0.08
Any incorrect identification OR 0.66 (0.37–1.19) 0.17 1.11 (0.63–1.97) 0.71
 Videos with polyps OR 0.86 (0.35–2.11) 0.75 1.29 (0.54–3.10) 0.57
 Videos without polyps OR 0.53 (0.24–1.17) 0.11 1.00 (0.47–2.13) 1.00