Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Depress Anxiety. 2015 Dec 18;33(5):400–414. doi: 10.1002/da.22461

TABLE 2.

Effects of psychological treatments for depressed college students compared with control groups: Hedges’ ga

N comp g 95% CI I2 95% CI P b NNT
All studies 22 0.89 0.66~1.11 57 23-72 2.13
Two outliers excluded 20 0.96 0.75~1.17 42 0~65 1.99
Only BDI 17 1.02 0.78~1.26 46 0~68 1.89
One ES per study (highest) 15 0.79 0.53~1.05 64 29~78 2.36
One ES per study (lowest) 15 0.70 0.48~0.93 53 0~73 2.63
Subgroup analyses
Compensation Yes 6 0.53 0.18~0.88 71 0~85 0.01 3.42
No 16 1.08 0.81~1.36 36 0~64 1.81
Recruitment Announcements 13 0.96 0.65~1.26 52 0~73 0.38 1.99
Clinical referrals 5 1.07 0.53~1.62 12 0~68 1.82
Screening 4 0.63 0.17~1.08 79 4~90 2.91
Depression Mood disorder 4 1.16 0.57~1.76 44 0~80 0.06 1.70
Self-report 16 0.95 0.69~1.20 49 0~70 2.01
Subthreshold 2 0.26 −0.31~0.82 75 xxx) 6.85
Psychological treatment CBT 14 0.88 0.61~1.14 64 25~78 0.19 2.15
BA 4 1.27 0.69~1.84 0 0~68 1.59
Other 4 0.54 −0.01~1.08 40 0~79 3.36
Format Group 14 0.66 0.43~0.90 50 0~71 0.003 2.78
Individual 8 1.35 0.96~1.73 27 0~67 1.52
Control group Waiting list 12 1.13 0.81~1.46 30 0~64 0.02 1.74
Care-as-usual 6 0.90 0.55~1.25 54 0~80 2.10
Other 4 0.33 −0.10~0.76 66 0~86 5.43
*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01,

***

P < 0.001.

CI, confidence interval; Ncomp, number of comparisons; NNT, numbers-needed-to-treat.

a

According to the random effects model.

b

The P-values in this column indicate whether the difference between the effect sizes in the subgroups is significant.