Table 1.
Summary of existing international guidelines on revascularisation in patients with LV systolic dysfunction with predominant heart failure symptoms
| Society | Guideline | Year | Recommendation | Class | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHA | CABG | 2011 | CABG to improve survival is reasonable in patients with mild to moderate LV systolic function (EF 35–50 %) and significant (≥75 % diameter stenosis) multi-vessel CAD or proximal LAD stenosis, where viable myocardium is present in the region of intended revascularisation | IIa | B |
| AHA | CABG | 2011 | CABG might be considered with the primary or sole intent of improving survival in patients with stable IHD with severe systolic dysfunction whether or not viable myocardium is present | IIb | B |
| AHA | Heart failure | 2013 | CABG should be considered in patients with ICM and operable coronary anatomy whether or not viable myocardium is present | IIb | B |
| ESC | Heart failure | 2012 | CABG is recommended for patients with angina and significant left main stem stenosis, who are otherwise suitable for surgery to reduce the risk of premature death | I | C |
| ESC | Heart failure | 2012 | PCI may be considered as an alternative to CABG in patients unsuitable for surgery | IIb | C |
| ESC | Myocardial revascularisation | 2014 | Revascularisation for prognosis in patients with 2- or 3-vessel coronary artery disease with stenosis >50 % and impaired LV function (EF <40 %) | I | A |
| ESC | Myocardial revascularisation | 2014 | CABG is recommended in left main stem stenosis in patients with severe LV dysfunction | I | C |