Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 10;33(4):610–625. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0309-6

Table 3.

Efficacy comparisons between subgroups during evaluation

Number of patients Hemoglobin (g/dL) Hemoglobin fluctuation (g/dL) Overall stability (%) Average monthly dose (µg) % dose changes Dose changes per patient
All 2060 11.4 0.48 78 131.3 18.0 0.4
Target group L 935 11.2 0.46 80 124.7 19.1 0.4
Target group U 1125 11.6 0.50 b 77 136.9 b 17.1 0.3
Female 874 11.4 0.48 80 131.0 17.2 0.3
Male 1186 11.5 0.48 77 131.6 18.5 0.4
Age <65 1090 11.5 0.5 77 131.5 18.4 0.4
Age ≥65 932 11.4 0.45 a 80 129.3 17.5 0.4
NT-proBNP <5000 975e 11.4 0.47 78 124.3 18.1 0.4
NT-proBNP ≥5000 624e 11.4 0.49 80 138.0 c 18.2 0.4
No CV risk 283 11.5 0.51 78 127.8 17.7 0.4
Cardiac risk 565 11.4 0.46 d 78 136.2 18.0 0.4
Vascular risk 1675 11.4 0.48 79 132.2 18.1 0.4
Diabetes at baseline 535 11.3 0.47 76 132.5 17.4 0.3

Italicized values indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) between subgroups: a p < 0.001; b p = 0.001; c p = 0.002; d p = 0.01

eNT-proBNP was not measured for all patients

CV cardiovascular, L lower, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, U upper