Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;25(1):35–42. doi: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-03

Table 2: Injuries, treatment numbers and actual RTP vs historically anticipated range of RTP in 65 consecutively-treated and fully followed-up subjects.

Damage assessment Condition Examined Cases (N = 65) Average No of Tx F/U (months) Average RTP (days) Expected RTP range (days)
Hamstring Strain 19 4 2 7 10–14
Knee Sprain (LCL, MCL) 14 3 1 5.75 7–10
Ankle Sprain 11 3 2 3.6 7–10
Costochondral Sprain 3 4 2 5.5 7–14
Hip pointer 1 3 2 4 7–10
1+ Ankle Sprain 3 3 3 7.3 10–14
1+ Hamstring Strain 3 6 3 19 14–28
1+ Knee sprain 1 4 4 10 12–14
1++ Knee sprain (LCL, MCL) 1 4 4 11 14–28
Knee Sprain (LCL, MCL) 6 6 4 16 28–42
Costochondral Sprain 1 5 4 17 28–42
Hip pointer 1 5 4 7 21–24
2+ Ankle sprain 1 5 4 12 28–42
Means ± SEM 9.62 ± 1.41* 19.23 ± 2.91

1° = mild; 1+ = moderate; 1++ = moderate/severe; 2° = severe; 2+ = very severe.

RTP = return to play; LCL = lateral collateral ligament; MCL = medial collateral ligament

*Statistically significant: P=0.0066 (Two-tailed Student's t-test, 95% confidence interval)