Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;13(4):415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040415

Table 1.

Comparison between pen-and-paper, and mobile and web technology using pre and post treatment results by study and overall.

Pain intensity
Study Variable Technology Pen and Paper Technology Pen and Paper Favourable To
Pre Treatment Post Treatment Pre Treatment Post Treatment Aggregated Value SD Aggregated Value SD
Value (SD) Value (SD) Value (SD) Value (SD)
Berman [41] BPI (mean) 52 (19.40) 45.60 (18.30) 54.30 (17.40) 47.30 (18.40) 48.61 13.31 51 12.64 Technology
Buhrman [36] Pain (mean) 37.40 (18.20) 34.30 (16.80) 44.4 (14.20) 39.6 (16.30) 35.73 12.34 42.33 10.71 Technology
MP—pa in severity 63.33 (31.67) 40 (18.33) 83.33 (28.33) 53.33 (13.33) 45.86 15.87 58.77 12.06 Technology
Devineni [42] Headache pain 31.80 (17) 18.60 (13) 35.50 (15.50) 30.60 (14.70) 23.47 10.33 32.92 10.67 Technology
Hicks [43] Pain (mean) 48 (13) 34 (24) 43 (16) 47 (22) 44.82 11.43 44.38 12.94 Pen-and-Paper
Litt [44] MPI (mean) 43.83 (21) 20.50 (16.33) 35.17 (14.33) 25 (22.67) 29.29 12.89 32.26 12.11 Technology
Ljótsson [45] Pain 65 (42.50) 35 (37.50) 60 (37.50) 60 (40) 48.13 28.12 60 27.36 Technology
Lorig [39] Pain 65.30 (22.70) 58.60 (24.40) 63.70 (22.20) 63.40 (23.10) 62.19 16.62 63.56 16.01 Technology
Palermo [37] Pain 54.50 (22.50) 35.40 (24.20) 51.70 (16.50) 47.60 (18.40) 45.64 16.48 49.87 12.28 Technology
Retrospective pain 66.30 (18.70) 49.60 (21.80) 61.60 (18.40) 54.50 (20.40) 59.22 14.19 58.42 13.66 Pen-and-Paper
Ruehlman [46] PCP-S—pain severity 76.47 (9.72) 71.10 (12.94) 74.78 (10.91) 71.66 (13.28) 74.53 7.77 73.52 8.43 Pen-and-Paper
Turner [47] Pain (mean) 43 (22) 39 (24) 43 (19) 40 (22) 41.17 16.22 41.72 14.38 Technology
Williams [48] BPI—pain severity 51 (14) 43 (16) 49 (14) 49 (15) 47.53 10.54 49 10.23 Technology
Fusion value 55.90 (4.80) 40.57 (5.08) 52.65 (4.56) 49.02 (4.94) 48.67 3.49 50.98 3.35 Equivalent
alpha 23.04 25.82 20.79 24.38