Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 22;13(4):441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040441

Table 5.

Variables related to the dentists choice of a minimally invasive and invasive treatment approach in Patient Case 2.

Independent Variables % (n) Minimal Invasive Treatment Invasive Treatment
Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted
OR 95% CI p-Value OR 95% CI p-Value OR 95% CI p-Value OR 95% CI p-Value
Dentist’s Age
≥35 years 27.5 (557) - - - - - - - - - - - -
36–47 years 27.0 (548) 0.73 0.56–0.95 0.02 0.80 0.61–1.05 0.10 0.76 0.42–0.95 1.41 0.71 0.39–1.32 0.28
≥48 years 45.5 (921) 0.51 0.40–0.65 <0.01 0.54 0.42–0.69 <0.01 0.87 0.51–0.65 1.46 0.74 0.43–1.27 0.28
Dentist’s Gender
Female 48.1 (974) - - - - - - - - - - - -
Male 51.9 (1052) 0.62 0.51–0.76 <0.01 0.82 0.65–1.02 0.07 1.97 1.23–3.18 <0.01 2.06 1.24–3.42 2.06
Practice Type
Private Practice 64.1 (1299) - - - - - - - - - - - -
Public Dental Service 34.1 (690) 2.36 1.92–2.91 <0.01 2.19 1.76–2.72 <0.01 0.62 0.37–1.03 0.07 0.79 0.46–1.35 0.38
Other 1.8 (37) 1.37 0.64–2.94 0.42 1.52 0.70–3.30 0.29
DMFT in County
Continuous Variable 100 (2026) 1.03 0.88–1.19 0.73 0.89 0.63–1.24 0.49 - - -
Number of Patients per Dentist in County
Continuous Variable 100 (2026) 1.01 1.00–1.01 0.01 1.01 1.00–1.01 0.03 1.01 1.00–1.01 0.01 1.01 1.00–1.01 0.01