Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;17:186. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1054-1

Table 4.

Performance comparison with other methods on Krogan dataset using CYC2008 as benchmark

P R F Sn PPV Acc
Our method 0.468 0.475 0.471 0.364 0.729 0.515
ClusterONE 0.375 0.431 0.401 0.523 0.655 0.585
COAN 0.709 0.331 0.451 0.388 0.646 0.501
COACH 0.617 0.343 0.441 0.432 0.544 0.485
CMC 0.748 0.235 0.358 0.381 0.589 0.474
HUNTER 0.865 0.199 0.323 0.374 0.569 0.462
MCL 0.291 0.245 0.266 0.57 0.396 0.475

F: F-score, P: precision, R: recall. The highest score of each row is shown in bold