Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;17:186. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1054-1

Table 6.

Performance comparison with other methods on MIPS dataset using CYC2008 as benchmark

P R F Sn PPV Acc
Our method 0.467 0.324 0.382 0.245 0.662 0.403
ClusterONE 0.359 0.23 0.281 0.243 0.668 0.403
COAN 0.453 0.282 0.348 0.271 0.55 0.386
COACH 0.301 0.289 0.295 0.336 0.311 0.323
CMC 0.429 0.211 0.283 0.389 0.318 0.352
HUNTER 0.654 0.11 0.189 0.296 0.286 0.291
MCL 0.164 0.154 0.159 0.444 0.212 0.307

F: F-score, P: precision, R: recall. The highest score of each row is shown in bold