Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;17:186. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1054-1

Table 9.

Performance comparison with other methods on MIPS dataset using MIPS2006 as benchmark

P R F Sn PPV Acc
Our method 0.336 0.401 0.372 0.24 0.683 0.405
ClusterONE 0.281 0.327 0.302 0.262 0.69 0.426
COAN 0.343 0.366 0.358 0.303 0.515 0.395
COACH 0.286 0.373 0.286 0.333 0.359 0.346
CMC 0.299 0.318 0.308 0.381 0.473 0.424
HUNTER 0.462 0.138 0.213 0.298 0.341 0.319
MCL 0.108 0.194 0.139 0.451 0.266 0.347

F: F-score, P: precision, R: recall. The highest score of each row is shown in bold