Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Abus. 2016 Jan-Mar;37(1):134–140. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1129524

Table 2.

Contingency Management Adoption among Providers in the Science to Service Laboratory (SSL) Condition Relative to Training as Usual (TAU)

SSL
TAU
4-Week Period n % n % Effect Group*Time p OR L95CI U95CI
1 37 5.4% 20 20.0% Reference -- -- 0.23 0.04 1.38
2 36 19.4% 18 11.1% −0.76 2.65 0.08 1.93 0.36 10.42
3 36 25.0% 18 16.7% −0.08 2.43 0.09 1.67 0.39 7.11
4 36 25.0% 18 22.2% 0.48 1.87 0.18 1.17 0.30 4.47
5 36 19.4% 18 27.8% 0.97 0.92 0.50 0.63 0.17 2.35
6 36 52.8% 18 16.7% −0.08 4.18 0.00 5.59 1.38 22.70
7 36 69.4% 18 16.7% −0.08 5.22 0.00 11.36 2.72 47.40
8 36 80.6% 17 23.5% 0.51 5.48 0.00 13.46 3.35 54.15
9 36 72.2% 17 17.6% −0.06 5.39 0.00 12.13 2.86 51.45
10 35 65.7% 17 35.3% 1.49 3.35 0.01 3.51 1.04 11.85
11 34 52.9% 17 29.4% 1.02 2.98 0.03 2.70 0.78 9.35
12 34 50.0% 17 29.4% 1.02 2.81 0.04 2.40 0.69 8.30
13 34 52.9% 17 23.5% 0.51 3.49 0.01 3.66 0.99 13.52

Note: Regression model estimates for the difference between SSL compared to TAU and changes in this effect at each time point include model terms for highest degree and caseload of providers. OR = odds ratio; L95CI = lower 95% confidence interval; H95CI = higher 95% confidence interval.