Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0153686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153686

Table 8. Difference in Aversiveness Ratings by Word Type.

Type Exp Mdiff 95%CI t d χ2
Moist 1 24.061 16.684 31.439 7.335*** 0.854 NA
4 47.535 39.452 55.618 14.964*** 1.705 NA
5 32.156 25.831 38.482 11.792*** 1.131 NA
Semantic related 1 5.928 1.607 10.249 2.559* 0.315 6.52*
4 14.500 9.037 19.963 5.451*** 0.755 28.69***
5 6.650 2.624 10.675 3.325** 0.352 10.97**
Phono related 1 2.727 -1.990 7.444 1.123 0.139 1.23
4 4.792 -0.682 10.265 1.846 0.265 3.40
5 5.132 1.185 9.079 2.655** 0.282 7.02**
Bodily function 1 6.346 0.668 12.025 2.204* 0.272 4.85*
4 12.117 4.834 19.399 3.288** 0.467 10.72**
5 5.850 1.056 10.643 2.295* 0.244 5.25*
Sex 1 1.040 -4.307 6.386 0.388 0.048 0.15
4 8.010 1.181 14.839 2.159* 0.309 4.64*
5 3.571 -1.224 8.366 1.487 0.159 2.21
Negative 1 4.092 -0.471 8.656 1.702 0.210 2.89
4 6.840 1.234 12.445 2.192* 0.314 4.79*
5 0.397 -3.923 4.716 0.176 0.019 2.21
Positive 1 0.802 -4.850 6.454 0.286 0.036 0.08
4 -0.050 -5.001 4.902 0.021 -0.003 0.01
5 4.897 -0.170 9.963 2.161* 0.230 4.66*

Differences between averse and non-averse participants’ ratings of the aversiveness of words from seven lexical categories for Experiments 1, 4, and 5. The χ2 statistic represents the additional variance explained by a mixed-effect linear regression model that included a test for an interaction between self-reported moist-aversion and word type. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences at the *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 levels.