Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 15;5:e13152. doi: 10.7554/eLife.13152

Table 3.

Summary of the best set 1 candidate models by interface energy.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13152.018

Ligand Set Best model by interface energy
Interface energy score (kcal/mol) Rosetta total energy (kcal/mol) H-bond and Salt bridges Interactions Distances between corresponding atom pairs (Å)
PS 1A -6.64 -1464.65 Head - R29 2.90, 2.77
P - R66 2.67
Tail - R66 3.45, 2.93
1B -3.06 -1461.49 Head - R29 2.84, 2.90, 3.32
P - R66 2.89, 3.32
1C -3.15 -1461.72 Head - R29 2.87, 3.43
Head - E36 2.95
P - R66 2.86
PE 1A -2.90 -1465.81 Head - E63 2.92
P - R66 3.19
Tail - R66 2.76, 3.24
Tail - R29 2.92
1B -2.92 -1464.62 Head - E63 2.95
P - R66 2.88, 3.43
1C -2.61 -1466.02 Head - E63 2.98
P - R66 2.84, 3.61

Ligand in set 1A has the longest tail construct (kept up to the α carbon). Ligand in set 1B only has head group and phosphate. Ligand in set 1C has one carbon after the ester linkage. Head is the ligand head group. P is the ligand phosphate moiety. Tail includes the ligand glycerol moiety and two fatty acid chains.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure