TABLE 2. QRS Detection Performance on the MITDB and the EDB.
| Method | MITDB | EDB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| This work# | 99.87 | 99.90 | 99.71 | 99.84 |
| Di Marco and Chiari [7] | 99.86 | 99.77 | 99.56 | 99.81 |
| Ghaffari et al. [13] | 99.88 | 99.91 | 99.55 | 99.63 |
| Ghaffari et al. [14] | 99.91 | 99.94 | - | - |
| Liu et al. [10]$ | 99.86 | 99.80 | - | - |
| Li et al. [11]+ | 99.94 | 99.89 | - | - |
| Martinez et al. [16] | 99.97 | 99.71 | 99.73 | 99.67 |
| Martinez et al. [12] | 99.86 | 99.80 | 99.48 | 99.61 |
| Zhang and Bae [15]* | 99.82 | 99.76 | - | - |
| Pan and Tompkins [6]+,# | 99.54 | 99.75 | - | - |
| Zidelmal et al. [9] | 99.82 | 99.64 | - | - |
- Not stated in paper.
#
Algorithm is implemented and tested in a microprocessor.
$
Algorithm is implemented and tested on an ASIC.
*
Algorithm is implemented and tested on a FPGA.
+
A discrepancy was found between the stated total number of beats and the record-by-record total number of heats. In this table, the record-by-record numbers are applied.