Skip to main content
. 2016 May 5;26(5):272–276. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150077

Table 1. Characteristics of participants stratified by sex both in community dwellers and dialysis patients.

Subjects Community dwellers (n = 26 454) Dialysis patients (n = 1510)


Men Women Men Women
(n = 9155) (n = 17 299) (n = 1003) (n = 507)
Mean (SD) age years 64.3 (11.4) 61.6 (11.5) 61.8 (12.9) 62.4 (12.8)
Age-adjusted mean (95% CI)
 BMI kg/m2 23.9 (23.8–23.9) 24.1 (24.0–24.1) 21.3 (21.1–21.5)a 20.3 (20.0–20.6)a
 SBP mm Hg 131.0 (130.6–131.4) 127.0 (126.8–127.3) 153.6 (152.0–155.1)a 153.4 (151.2–155.6)a
 TC mg/dL 191.3 (190.6–192.0) 205.8 (205.3–206.3) 147.0 (144.8–149.2)a 164.0 (161.0–167.1)a
 HDL-C mg/dL 55.9 (55.6–56.2) 60.9 (60.7–61.1) 44.8 (43.9–46.0)a 50.3 (49.0–51.6)a
 HbA1c % 5.55 (5.54–5.56) 5.53 (5.52–5.54) 5.18 (5.12–5.24)a 5.08 (5.00–5.17)a
 hsCRPc mg/L 0.56 (0.55–0.57) 0.46 (0.46–0.47) 1.39 (1.27–1.52)a 0.92 (0.81–1.05)a
Age-adjusted prevalence (95% CI), %
 AF   2.7% (2.4%–3.1%) 0.6% (0.5%–0.7%) 4.5% (3.3%–6.1%)b 1.4% (0.7%–2.8%)b
 Overweight   34.3% (33.3%–35.3%) 37.2% (36.5%–38.0%) 10.6% (8.8%–12.7%)b 7.8% (5.7%–10.4%)b
 Hypertension   46.0% (45.0%–47.1%) 42.2% (41.5%–43.0%) 84.9% (82.5%–87.0%)b 81.0% (77.3%–84.2%)b
 Diabetes mellitus   8.8% (8.3%–9.4%) 5.4% (5.1%–5.8%) 34.1% (31.1%–37.1%)b 23.1% (19.6%–27.0%)b
 Dyslipidemia   30.4% (29.5%–31.4%) 39.8% (39.0%–40.5%) 40.0% (36.9%–43.1%)b 29.2% (25.4%–33.3%)b
 Current smoker   29.0% (28.0%–29.9%) 1.9% (1.7%–2.1%) 32.9% (29.9%–36.1%) 5.6% (4.0%–7.9%)b
 Past smoker   31.3% (30.3%–32.2%) 1.6% (1.5%–1.8%) 38.7% (35.6%–41.8%)b 6.0% (4.2%–8.5%)b
 Regular drinker   44.6% (43.6%–45.6%) 3.7% (3.4%–4.0%) 8.7% (7.0%–10.6%)b 2.2% (1.2%–3.9%)

AF, atrial fibrillation; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; TC, total cholesterol level.

Adjusted means were estimated using ANCOVA, and adjusted prevalences were estimated using logistic regression after adjusting for age (65 years).

aP < 0.05 compared to the adjusted mean in community dwellers by ANCOVA.

bP < 0.05 compared to the adjusted prevalence in community dwellers by logistic regression analysis.

chsCRP data are expressed as age-adjusted geometric means (95% CI).