Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;18(4):e77. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5207

Table 3.

Characteristics of respondents who accessed or did not access the after-visit summary (AVS).a

Characteristics Accessed AVS
n=2248
Did not access AVS
n=1805
P
Gender (female), n (%) 1378 (61.30) 1112 (61.61) .84
Age (years), mean (SD) 56.5 (14.1) 56.3 (13.8) .73
Race (white), n (%) 2035 (90.52) 1633 (90.47) .95
Education (≥4-year college degree), n (%) 1325/2005 (66.08) 1102/1592 (69.22) .046
Income (≥US $75,000),b n (%) 1132/1801 (62.85) 878/1412 (62.18) .70
Marital status (married or unmarried couple), n (%) 1391/1996 (69.69) 1032/1577 (65.44) .007
Health status (very good or excellent),c n (%) 1022/2020 (50.59) 827/1598 (51.75) .49
Selected problems on problem list,d mean (SD) 2.2 (1.2) 2.1 (1.1) .03
Years with patient portal account, mean (SD) 3.6 (3.3) 3.1 (3.1) .001
Sessions with patient portal, mean (SD) 119.0 (221.5) 79.1 (123.3) .001
Messages sent via patient portal, mean (SD) 8.2 (20.8) 6.6 (18.2) .01
Satisfaction with patient portal (excellent),e n (%) 1032/2022 (51.03) 602/1584 (38.00) .001

a Data presented for patients who were aware that the AVS was available through the patient portal.

b In total household income from all sources before taxes.

c Rating of overall health was captured as excellent (5), very good (4), good (3), fair (2), or poor (1).

d The selected problems included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cancer (any), coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, asthma, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression.

e Satisfaction with patient portal was captured as excellent (5), very good (4), good (3), fair (2), or poor (1).