Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 14;2016:9631041. doi: 10.1155/2016/9631041

Table 2.

Baseline, follow-up scores, and estimates of the sample sizes in PSP (N = 12) and MSA (N = 8).

Baseline score Repeat score Annual change Number of subjects
required per arm
(20% reduction)
Number of subjects
required per arm
(50% reduction)
PSP
Whole-brain atrophy rate, % N/A N/A 1.26 ± 0.5 83 14
UPDRS III 37 ± 14.5 39.2 ± 19 2.3 ± 13 168 27
CGI-S 4.4 ± 0.5 4.6 ± 0.8 0.2 ± 0.6 4889 1048
H&Y 2.6 ± 0.7 3.3 ± 0.9 0.7 ± 0.8 631 101
FAB 10 ± 5.3 10.7 ± 7.8 0.7 ± 4.6 22688 3630
MSA
Whole-brain atrophy rate, % N/A N/A 1.65 ± 1.1 234 38
UPDRS III 45.3 ± 13 52.6 ± 10 7.1 ± 9.4 921 148
CGI-S 4.6 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 3.5 0.5 ± 0.5 621 100
H&Y 3.1 ± 0.8 3.7 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.7 526 85
FAB 12.0 ± 4.2 10.8 ± 4.4 −1.1 ± 3.4 5020 804

Difference between the baseline and repeat score with a p value < 0.05 (Wilcoxon's signed rank test). SIENA gives the whole-brain atrophy rate for image pairs and does not estimate the baseline and follow-up brain volume. All of the values are the mean ± SD.