Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 6;17(4):511. doi: 10.3390/ijms17040511

Table 4.

Differences in the anti-tumor and immunomodulatory effects of APF and the underlying affecting factors assessed by rank-sum ratio (RSR) method.

Items RSR_anti 1 RSR_immu RSR_compr
AP-AOH30-1 0.6944 0.4583 0.5764 5
AP-AOH30-2 0.5556 0.8194 0.6875
AP-AOH80-1 0.5833 0.2778 0.4306
AP-AOH80-2 0.5417 0.3194 0.4306
AP-ACl-1 0.5278 0.6389 0.5833
AP-ACl-2 0.3750 0.6944 0.5347
AP-ACl-3 0.5417 0.7917 0.6667
AP-H 0.4028 0.3611 0.3819
AP-L 0.7778 0.5972 0.6875
APF_30%EtOH 2 0.6250 0.6389 0.6319
APF_80%EtOH 0.5625 0.2986 0.4306
APF_sepharosec 3 0.4815 0.7083 0.5949
APF_cellulose 0.5938 0.4687 0.5313
APF_neutrald 4 0.6018 0.3148 0.5301
APF_acidic 0.5034 0.6563 0.5799

1 RSR_anti, RSR_immun, RSR_compr are calculated by RSR method from the anti-tumor assay, immunomodulatory assay and all the biological assessments, respectively; 2 APF_30%EtOH and APF_80%EtOH are all the polysaccharides precipitated by 30% and 80% (v/v) ethanol, respectively; 3 APF_sepharose and APF_celluose are all the polysaccharides fractionated by DEAE-sepharose fast flow (Cl form) column and DEAE-52 cellulose (OH form) column, respectively; 4 APF_neutral and APF_acidic are all the polysaccharides eluated by water and NaCl solution, respectively; 5 The larger of the RSR value is the more superior it is.