Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 11;17(4):542. doi: 10.3390/ijms17040542

Table 1.

Comparison of echocardiographic data after sham or I/R operation.

Echocardiografic Parameter WT Sham SMP30 KO Sham WT I/R SMP30 KO I/R
IVSd (mm) 0.75 ± 0.05 0.73 ± 0.06 0.73 ± 0.05 0.73 ± 0.04
LVPWd (mm) 0.71 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.07 0.74 ± 0.05 0.71 ± 0.04
LVEDd (mm) 3.01 ± 0.11 3.08 ± 0.08 2.92 ± 0.31 2.87 ± 0.32
LVESd (mm) 1.42 ± 0.07 1.45 ± 0.05 1.65 ± 0.28 ** 1.81 ± 0.30 **,#
LVFS (%) 52.8 ± 2.1 53.0 ± 1.6 43.4 ± 5.1 ** 37.3 ± 4.3 **,#
HR (bpm) 499 ± 37 520 ± 44 478 ± 46 509 ± 25

IVSd, interventricular septum diameter; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall diameter; LVEDd, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVESd, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening; HR, heart rate. Data are presented as mean ± SD from 10 to 15 mice in each group. ** p < 0.01 vs. sham-operated mice, and # p < 0.05 vs. WT I/R mice.