Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb 1;109(1):125–132. doi: 10.6028/jres.109.009

Table 3.

For each test structure: a) the RF value by EXTRA and ALLHKL in a traditional extraction run (Protocol 1); b) the RF value by EXTRA and ALLHKL by using the true (calculated by the published positions) |F | values as starting point (Protocol 2) are shown

Code EXTRA ALLHKL
Protocol 1 Protocol 2 Protocol 1 Protocol 2
AGPZ 0.53 0.26 0.62 0.61
BACO 0.34 0.21 0.39 0.39
BENZ 0.43 0.22 0.52 0.80
CF3BR 0.33 0.15 0.59 0.46
CFCL 0.22 0.12 0.34 0.27
CFI 0.50 0.32 0.74 0.84
CROX 0.39 0.16 0.55 0.60
CUPZ 0.50 0.24 0.86 0.74
LAMO 0.39 0.22 0.39 0.45
LASI 0.39 0.16 0.45 0.47
LEV 0.60 0.23
MES 0.49 0.26 0.73 0.77
METYL 0.32 0.25 0.37 0.54
NBPO 0.44 0.12 0.52 1.11
NIZR 0.43 0.24 0.61 0.55
PBS 0.43 0.26 0.48 0.43
SAPO 0.47 0.19 0.87 0.86
SBPO 0.51 0.15 0.82 0.79
SULPH 0.34 0.20 0.44 0.56
YONO 0.31 0.18 0.32 0.42