Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0152911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152911

Table 2. Impact of level of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support on hemodynamics in a dog model of ischemia-reperfusion.

HR MAP CO LVAD flow RAP LAP Peak LVP
(bpm) (mmHg) (ml/min/kg) (ml/min/kg) (mmHg) (mmHg) (mmHg)
Baseline
Control 149±7 101±18 96±13 0 3.0±1.3 5.7±1.5
p-LVAD 144±17 96±11 92±10 0 3.0±0.7 5.3±0.8
t-LVAD 141±7 94±13 103±13 0 3.5±1.1 6.0±0.9
90 min after ischemia
Control 132±18 98±19 106±23 0 4.2±1.9 9.9±2.9
p-LVAD 139±20 114±18 63±16* 65±18* 3.2±1.2 5.0±3.0*
t-LVAD 147±4 115±13 0* 125±24* 3.3±0.8 0.9±0.3* 32±2
300 min after reperfusion
Control 111±13 97±18 68±13 0 4.4±1.7 11.5±4.8
p-LVAD 117±11 99±12 26±4* 28±4* 3.0±2.0 7.9±4.5*
t-LVAD 124±11* 104±20 0* 62±16* 4.0±0.6 0.5±0.3* 28±7

Data are expressed as means ± SD. Control, no LVAD support (n = 6); p-LVAD, partial LVAD support (n = 5); t-LVAD, total LVAD support (n = 5); HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure; CO, cardiac output; LVAD flow, flow of left ventricular assist device; RAP, right atrial pressure; LAP, left atrial pressure; Peak LVP, peak LV pressure.

*p < 0.05 versus Control;

p < 0.05 versus p-LVAD.