Table 2. Summary statistics for household food and water insecurity, socio-economic status, and women’s psychological distress: Baseline and endline measures in intervention and control villages in South Wello, Ethiopia (n = 123).
Control group (n = 49) | Intervention group (n = 74) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | |
at baseline | at endline | at baseline | at endline | |
Water insecurity | 2.20 (2.08) | 2.31 (2.20) | 3.05 (3.79) | 1.16 (1.67) ** |
Food insecurity | 4.67 (5.39) | 4.31 (5.83) | 5.57 (5.54) | 3.14 (3.81) ** |
Psychological distress | 7.14 (4.58) | 4.86 (4.27)** | 6.01 (4.47) | 3.72 (3.78) ** |
Socio-economic status | -0.11 (1.66) | -0.24 (1.63) | 0.12 (1.72) | 0.31 (1.65) |
Harvest quality | 0.11 (0.32) | 0.93 (0.25)** | 0.13 (0.34) | 0.77 (0.42) ** |
Notes:
Household water insecurity is measured on a 21-point scale based on formative work in South Gondar, Ethiopia [16]
Food insecurity is measured by the USDA Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (range 0–27) [38]
Psychological distress is measured on a 20-point scale (SRQ-20) [29]
Socio-economic status (SES) score is derived from principal components analysis of land ownership (hectares), livestock (numbers of sheep, goats, oxen, cows, calves, donkeys, horses, mules, camels), and any off-farm work, according to the procedure proposed by Filmer & Pritchett (2001) [37].
Harvest quality is a binary variable, for each household denoting 0 if the past year’s harvest was said to be insufficient, and 1 if the past year’s harvest was said to be sufficient.
** indicates difference between baseline and endline is significant at p <0.01 (paired t-test)