Table 4.
Seff | Mean difference [m/s] | LOA [m/s] | Pearson’s ρ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5T | 3T | Total | 1.5T | 3T | Total | 1.5T | 3T | Total | |
60% | −0.03±0.06 | 0.03±0.03 | −0.00±0.06 | 0.28±0.03 | 0.25±0.07 | 0.27±0.05 | 0.79±0.08 | 0.89±0.05 | 0.84±0.08 |
80% | −0.04±0.06 | 0.01±0.02 | −0.01±0.06 | 0.25±0.03 | 0.21±0.06 | 0.23±0.04 | 0.84±0.03 | 0.92±0.03 | 0.89±0.05 |
100% | −0.02±0.07 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.02±0.07 | 0.30±0.03 | 0.25±0.05 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.77±0.04 | 0.89±0.03 | 0.83±0.07 |
For each fixed Seff (60%, 80%, 100%) the voxel-by-voxel velocity magnitude difference between scans with the fixed Seff and the conventional navigator setting was analyzed. Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships in all cases with P < 0.001.