Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):1026–1037. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.14185

TABLE 4.

Percentage Agreement of Organ- and Structure-Specific Diagnosis Codes From the Three Half-Dose Configurations and the Full Dose Plus Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) Configuration in Two Chest Organs (Lung and Mediastinum).

Organ, Reader Absolute Agreement, % (No./Total)
Normality Agreement, % (No./Total)
FBP SAFIRE aNLM FBP SAFIRE aNLM

Lung
 Reader 1 88 (22/25) 84 (21/25) 80 (20/25) 96 (24/25) 92 (23/25) 92 (23/25)
 Reader 2 96 (24/25) 100 (25/25) 100 (25/25) 96 (24/25) 100 (25/25) 100 (25/25)
 Reader 3 84 (21/25) 92 (23/25) 92 (23/25) 84 (21/25) 92 (23/25) 92 (23/25)
 All readers 89 (67/75) 92 (69/75) 91 (68/75) 92 (69/75) 95 (71/75) 95 (71/75)
Mediastinum
 Reader 1 100 (25/25) 96 (24/25) 100 (25/25) 100 (25/25) 96 (24/25) 100 (25/25)
 Reader 2 96 (24/25) 96 (24/25) 100 (25/25) 96 (24/25) 96 (24/25) 100 (25/25)
 Reader 3 88 (22/25) 92 (23/25) 92 (23/25) 88 (22/25) 92 (23/25) 92 (23/25)
 All readers 95 (71/75) 95 (71/75) 97 (72/75) 95 (71/75) 95 (71/75) 97 (73/75)

Note—The three half-dose configurations were FBP, sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE, Siemens Healthcare), and adaptive nonlocal means (aNLM). Absolute agreement was the percentage of cases with absolute agreement between diagnosis codes. Normality agreement occurred if both the full-dose and the half-dose configuration were normal or if both were not normal.