Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar;13(1):101–119. doi: 10.28092/j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0092

Table1.

Summary of clinical data showing the association between APN and risk and prognosis of various cancers

Cancer type Study outcome Additional comments Study type Reference
BC P<0.005 (for tumor size); P<0.05 (for grade) >2 cm tumor and grade 2 and 3 BC cases were higher in lower tertile of serum APN CC 71
P=0.001 Total serum APN levels lower in BC patients, but APN levels not significantly associated with BC risk in premenopausal women (P=0.829) Meta-analysis 72
Adjusted OR=0.04 (0.071-0.99) Lower APN in early BC vs. healthy controls CC 73
P=0.43 for linear trend No association with risk CC 74
P=0.024 Negative correlation with HMW APN and BC risk CC 75
CRC P=0.005 CRC cases had significantly lower APN values than controls Meta-analysis 80
OR=0.91; P=0.04 Significant inverse association between APN and CRC Meta-analysis 81
P=0.80 No association between APN and CRC CC 83
P<0.001 Lower APN levels in CRC and adenoma patients Meta-analysis 82
P<0.0001 AdipoR1/R2 levels increased in CRC patients CC 85
OR=0.24; P<0.001 Lower APN in adenoma patients than controls, lower APN levels negatively associated with number and size of tumors CC 86
P=0.009 (tubular) P<0.001 (tubulovillous) Lower AdipoR1/R2 levels in CRCs than colorectal adenomas CC 87
OR=0.72 (0.53-0.99) for CRC risk; P=0.005 Lower APN correlates to CRC risk; APN inversely correlates to tumor grade CC 88
EC Summary RR=0.40 (0.33-0.66) High APN reduces EC risk Meta-analysis 93
OR=0.42 (0.19-0.94) Inverse association with EC risk, association stronger in pre-menopausal than post-menopausal CC 94
OR=0.56 (0.36-0.86) Inverse association independent of other obesity risk factors CC 95
OR=0.52 (0.32-0.83); P<0.001 Significant inverse association between EC risk and APN CC 96
Summary OR=0.47 (0.34-0.65) for APN Summary OR=0.45 (0.24-0.86) for APN/leptin ratio Reduced EC risk with higher APN levels (18% risk reduction with 5 μg/mL increase in circulating APN Meta-analysis 97
Adjusted OR=4.89 (1.25-19.11); P=0.022 Lower MMW APN significantly associated with increased risk of EC CC 101
GC P<0.05 Inverse association with pathological findings e.g. tumor size, depth of invasion, tumor stage (only in undifferentiated GC) CC 104
P>0.05 No significant association between APN with GC risk and histopathological variables detected CC 105
P=0.01 Significantly longer survival time in AdipoR1 positive cases CC 106
P>0.05 No statistically significant relationship between AdipoR1/2 expression and tumor stage and survival CC 107
OG (esophageal) P<0.05 Significantly reduced APN in ESCC and EA patients than controls EA patients had lower APN than ESCC CC 110
P=0.01 Serum APN significantly reduced in patients than controls CC 111
P=0.043 (for T category) 0.56 (0.35-0.90); P=0.017 (for survival) AdipoR2 expression was inversely associated with T-category). Low AdipoR1 was associated with improved overall survival CC 114
PC OR-0.55 (0.31-0.98); P=0.03 Higher APN negatively correlated with PC risk CC 115
Nonlinear relationship (P<0.01) Low pre-diagnostic levels of APN associated with increased PC risk CC 116
P=0.0035 Median APN levels higher in PC than control group CC 117
OR=2.81 (1.04-7.59) Higher APN associated with increased PC risk, no association with PC stage CC 118
HC Adjusted OR=3.30 (1.45-7.53); P<0.01 (for total APN Adjusted OR=3.41 (1.50-7.73); P<0.01 (for HMW APN) Plasma total and HMW APN were higher in patients than controls serum APN was positively associated with HC risk CC 121
P=0.007 Increased APN staining was associated with poor survival CC 122
P=0.03 APN remained a significant predictor of time to death CC 123
P=0.005 (for APN) P<0.001 (for AdipoR1) P=0.003 (for AdipoR2) APN and AdipoR1 levels were significantly lower in HCC cases than non-neoplastic controls AdipoR2 expression correlated with lower histological grade CC 124
RC OR=0.76 (0.57-1.00); P=0.05 Inverse association between serum APN and RCC risk CC 127
P<0.01 (tumor size); P=0.029 (non-metastatic vs metastatic) Negative association between APN levels and tumor size Lower APN levels in metastatic cases CC 128
P=0.044 (for total APN); P=0.041 (for HMW APN) Reduced APN levels in metastatic cases CC 129
OR=2.3 (1.1-4.6) APN and RCC risk positively correlated in African American males CC 130
PrC Standard mean difference=-0.893 μg/mL (-1.345 to -0.440); P=0.000 Serum APN was lower in PrC cases than controls Meta-analysis 132
OR=0.29 (0.10-0.89) Higher APN associated with reduced risk independent of various confounders CC 133
P<0.05 Significantly lower APN in PrC cases than controls CC 134
OR=0.62 (0.42-0.90); P=0.01 APN inversely associated with PrC stage in overweight and obese men CC 135
OR=0.70 (0.33-1.49); P=0.56 No significant association between APN and PrC risk CC 136
LC OR=1.13 (0.80-4.97) for cases vs. controls OR=0.25 (0.10-0.78) for advanced vs. limited APN not significantly different between cases and controls APN significantly lower in advanced than limited diseases stage CC 141
P>0.05 No significant findings CC 142
OR=2.00 (0.80-4.97); P=0.14 Non significant findings CC 143
P<0.0001 Leptin: APN ratio significantly lower in patients than controls CC 144
P<0.05 AdipoR1/R2 expression higher in non-neoplastic than neoplastic tissues, patients with higher expression of AdipoR1 had longer survival CC 145
HaemC P=0.00 APN was significantly lower in AML and ALL cases than controls CC 148
P<0.001 APN levels significantly lower in CLL cases than controls CC 151
P<0.05 APN levels were higher in CLL cases than controls CC 152