Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;110(8):1744–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.027

Table 1.

Summary of Simulations Performed

Simulation Description Time per Run (μs) Number of Runs
SS0f(a,b) equilibration of MCoTI-II without any disulfide bridges 3.5 (3) 2
SS0u(a,b,c) ≈0.5 μs of heating was applied before equilibration of MCoTI-II without any disulfide bridges 3.5 3
SS123f equilibration of MCoTI-II with all three disulfide bridges linked 1 1
SS2f equilibration of MCoTI-II with 11–23 linked 0.8 1
SS2u intermediate state selected from SS0u, followed by equilibration with 11–23 linked 0.8 1
SS3f equilibration of MCoTI-II with 17–29 linked 0.8 1
SS3u intermediate state selected from SS0u, followed by equilibration with 17–29 linked 0.8 1
SS23f equilibration of MCoTI-II with 11–23 and 17–29 linked 0.8 1