Skip to main content
PMC home page
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 2016 May 2;94(5):340–350F. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.163295

Adolescent suicidal behaviours in 32 low- and middle-income countries

Comportements suicidaires des adolescents dans 32 pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire

Conductas suicidas de los adolescentes en 32 países con ingresos bajos y medios

السلوك الانتحاري لدى المراهقين في 32 دولة من الدول منخفضة الدخل والدول متوسطة الدخل

32 个低收入和中等收入国家内的青少年自杀行为

Суицидальное поведение подростков в 32 странах с низким и средним уровнем доходов

Britt McKinnon a,✉, Geneviève Gariépy a, Mariane Sentenac a, Frank J Elgar a
PMCID: PMC4850530  PMID: 27147764

Abstract

Objective

To estimate prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicidal ideation with a plan in each surveyed country and to examine cross-national differences in associated risk factors.

Methods

We analysed data of students aged 13–17 years who participated in the 2003–2012 Global School-based Health Surveys in 32 countries, of which 29 are low- and middle-income. We used random effects meta-analysis to generate regional and overall pooled estimates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate risk ratios for the associated risk factors. Population attributable fractions were estimated based on adjusted risk ratios and the prevalence of the determinants within each exposure level.

Findings

Across all countries, the pooled 12-month prevalence of suicide ideation were 16.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 15.6 to 16.7) among females and 12.2% (95% CI: 11.7 to 12.7) among males and ideation with a plan were 8.3% (95% CI: 7.9 to 8.7) among females and 5.8% (95% CI: 5.5 to 6.1) among males. Suicide ideation in the WHO Region of the Americas was higher in females than males, with an estimated prevalence ratio of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.60 to 1.81), while this ratio was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.10) in the WHO African Region. Factors associated with suicidal ideation in most countries included experiences of bullying and physical violence, loneliness, limited parental support and alcohol and tobacco use.

Conclusion

The prevalence of adolescent suicidal behaviours varies across countries, yet a consistent set of risk factors of suicidal behaviours emerged across all regions and most countries.

Introduction

Worldwide, suicide accounts for an estimated 6% of all deaths among young people.1 As the second leading cause of mortality among females and the third leading cause among males aged 10–24 years, youth suicide is a major global public health concern.1 Low- and middle-income countries are home to more than 90% of the world’s children and youth and also account for over 75% of global suicide deaths.2 However, compared to high-income countries relatively little is known about the epidemiology of adolescent suicide and suicidal behaviours in low- and middle-income countries

Suicidal behaviours include ideation (thinking about killing oneself), planning suicide, attempting suicide and suicide itself.2 Suicidal ideation often emerges in adolescence and is prevalent among this age group, particularly among females.3 Across 17 European countries, the lifetime prevalence of ideation among students aged 15–16 years ranged from 15% (Armenia) to 31.5% (Hungary), while the lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts ranged from 4.1% to 23.5% in the same two countries, respectively.4 Across 49 low- and middle-income countries, 15.3% of adolescents aged 13–15 years had seriously considered suicide in the past year.5 Given that suicide ideation strongly and prospectively relates to suicide attempts and suicide,6,7 identifying potentially modifiable risk factors is essential for preventing these deaths.

Major risk factors for youth suicidal behaviours include being female, exposure to bullying and violence, alcohol and drug use, mental disorders and weak family and peer relationships.4,8,9 While much of this evidence comes from Europe and North America, recent research has expanded the knowledge of the determinants of youth suicidal behaviours in several low- and middle-income countries. Many factors associated with youth suicidal behaviours in low- and middle-income countries overlap with established risk factors from high-income countries, including bullying,10,11 physical and sexual abuse,10,12,13 mental disorders and depressive symptoms,10,13–16 substance use,10,14 and weak family and social relationships.14 However, research in some low- and middle-income countries suggests that gender and common mental health problems contribute less to suicidal behaviours.14,17,18 While studies from individual countries have provided insights about youth suicidal behaviours, differences in variable definitions and measures, study populations and analytical approaches make it difficult to compare the prevalence of and risk factors for youth suicidal behaviours across different settings.

The Global School-Based Health Survey (GSHS) has been conducted in over 80 countries worldwide and aims to provide comparable data on the health of adolescents aged 13–17 years19. GSHS data have been used to show cross-national variation in the prevalence of adolescent suicide ideation,5 examine suicide ideation in relation to psychosocial distress in seven African countries20 and study adolescent suicidal behaviours in individual low- and middle-income countries.10,15,18,21,22 In the present study, we estimate the cross-national prevalence of suicidal ideation and ideation with planning and examine correlates of these outcomes in a large and diverse sample of countries.

Methods

Data source

GSHS is a self-administered, school-based survey developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, in collaboration with the United Nations Children's Emergency Fund, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.19,23 The survey uses standardized school-based sampling and a set of core questionnaire modules that address leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, including alcohol and drug use, mental health, violence and unintentional injury and sexual behaviours. Some questions include country-specific examples, options or phrasing to facilitate adaptation of the surveys across diverse global populations. Many questions were adopted from the Youth Risk Behaviour Survey of American Adolescents, for which reliability has been formally evaluated.24 Reliability studies of the GSHS in low- and middle-income settings are limited, however one study among Fijian girls found high test–retest reliability of the two GSHS items on suicidal behaviours – suicidal ideation and ideation with a plan – with both showing agreement above 90% and kappa coefficients above 0.63.25

We included countries for which survey data on suicidal behaviours and potential risk factors were publicly available. Our sample included data from 38 surveys in 32 countries (Table 1). The survey dates ranged from 2003, the first year the survey was conducted, to 2012 the most recent year with publicly available data at the time of this analysis. The majority of countries conducted one survey over the time period. Where available, we pooled data from two surveys conducted in the same country. According to 2012 World Bank classification, 29 countries are considered low- and middle-income economies and three are high-income economies (Table 1).26 Although these three countries by definition are not low- and middle-income countries, we retained them for our analysis given the limited knowledge of adolescent suicidal behaviours in many high-income countries that are not part of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Countries were grouped by WHO region. Because of the relatively small number of countries from the South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions in our sample, data from these two regions were combined. Samples are nationally representative, except for the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Chile, China, Ecuador, United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe. For these countries, estimates are representative of selected cities or areas.

Table 1. Survey year(s) and sample size for countries that participated in the Global School-Based Health Survey,19 2003–2012.

Country by WHO region Income classificationa Year of survey(s) Sample size
African
Benin LIC 2009 2 659
Botswana UMC 2005 2 114
Kenya LIC 2003 3 317
Malawi LIC 2009 2 213
Mauritania LMC 2010 1 956
Uganda LIC 2003 2 985
United Republic of Tanzania LIC 2003 2 103
Zambia LMC 2003 1 960
Zimbabwe LIC 2003 5 482
Americas
Argentina UMC 2007 1 911
Chile UMC 2004 8 028
Costa Rica UMC 2009 2 626
Ecuador UMC 2007 5 232
Guatemala LMC 2009 5 370
Guyana LMC 2004, 2010 3 471
Peru UMC 2010 2 832
Trinidad and Tobago HIC 2007, 2011 5 482
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) UMC 2003 4 252
Eastern Mediterranean
Jordan UMC 2004, 2007 4 359
Kuwait HIC 2011 2 629
Lebanon UMC 2007, 2011 7 245
Morocco LMC 2006, 2010 5 275
Pakistan LMC 2009 5 085
Tunisia UMC 2008 2 759
United Arab Emirates HIC 2005 15 077
South-East Asia and Western Pacific
China UMC 2004 8 753
Indonesia LMC 2007 3 088
Malaysia UMC 2012 20 849
Maldives UMC 2009 2 919
Philippines LMC 2007, 2011 17 497
Sri Lanka LMC 2008 2 524
Thailand UMC 2008 2 718
Open in a new tab

HIC: high-income countries; LIC: low-income; LMC: lower-middle income; UMC: Upper-middle income; WHO: World Health Organization.

a Classification according to The World Bank.26

Measures

The questionnaire contained two questions on suicidal ideation and planning where the response option was “yes” or “no” (Table 2). The questions were: “During the past 12 months, did you ever seriously consider attempting suicide?” and: “During the past 12 months, did you ever make a plan about how you would attempt suicide?” Consistent with a recent study using the 2009 Benin GSHS, we defined variables for suicidal ideation as responding “yes” to the first question and variables for suicidal ideation with planning as responding “yes” to both questions.14

Table 2. Global School-Based Health Survey19 questions used in the analysis of adolescent suicidal behaviours in low- and middle-income countries.

Variable Question Values
Suicidal ideation During the past 12 months, did you ever seriously consider attempting suicide? 0 = no
1 = yes
Suicidal planning During the past 12 months, did you ever make a plan about how you would attempt suicide? 0 = no
1 = yes
Physical attacka During the past 12 months, how many times were you physically attacked? 1 = 0 times
2 = 1 time
3 = 2 or more times
Bullyingb During the past 30 days, on how many days were you bullied? 1 = 0 days
2 = 1 or 2 days
3 = 3 or more days
Food insecurity During the past 30 days, how often did you go hungry because there was not enough food in your home? 1 = never
2 = sometimes/rarely
3 = most of the time/always
Loneliness During the past 12 months, how often have you felt lonely? 1 = never/rarely
2 = sometimes
3 = most of the time/always
Lack of parental support During the past 30 days, how often did your parents or guardians understand your problems and worries? 1 = most of the time/always
2 = sometimes
3 = never/rarely
Few close friends How many close friends do you have? 1 = 3 or more
2 = 1 or 2
3 = none
Alcohol usec During the past 30 days, on how many days did you have at least one drink containing alcohol? 1 = 0 days
2 = 1–2 days
3 = 3 or more days
Cigarette smoking During the past 30 days, on how many days did you smoke cigarettes? 1 = 0 days
2 = 1–5 days
3 = 6 or more days
Open in a new tab

a In the survey questionnaire physical attack is defined as “when one or more people hit or strike someone, or when one or more people hurt another person with a weapon (such as a stick, knife, or gun)”. The survey questionnaire specifies that “it is not a physical attack when two students of about the same strength or power choose to fight each other”.

b Bullying is defined as “when a student or group of students say or do bad and unpleasant things to another student” or “when a student is teased a lot in an unpleasant way” or “when a student is left out of things on purpose”. The survey questionnaire specifies that “it is not bullying when two students of about the same strength or power argue or fight or when teasing is done in a friendly and fun way”.

c Drinking alcohol also includes consuming locally produced alcoholic drinks. The survey questionnaire specifies that “drinking alcohol does not include drinking a few sips of wine for religious purposes. A drink is defined as a glass of wine, a bottle of beer, a small glass of liquor, or a mixed drink”.

We selected a priori potential risk factors for suicidal ideation based on previous research on adolescents in low- , middle- and high-income countries and their inclusion in the survey.27–30 The determinants included were: psychosocial symptoms (loneliness, having close friends and parental support); substance use (alcohol use and cigarette smoking); being physically attacked; and bullying victimization. Given the survey does not include questions on family socioeconomic conditions, we included information on the frequency of going to bed hungry to capture some socioeconomic-related variation. The survey in some countries asked about other potentially important determinants (e.g. drug use, sexual assault); these were excluded because they were missing > 50% of the responses across the surveys.

Our analysis included an initial sample size of 164 770 across the 32 countries. The percentages of missing data were 1.8% (2966) for suicide ideation and 2.7% (4449) for planning suicide. Other variables were missing less than 5%, except for bullying (12.0%, 19 772), smoking (15.1%, 24 880), physical attacks (26.8%, 44 158) and alcohol use (28.4%, 46 795). To account for missing data, we performed multiple imputation using the mi impute chained procedure in Stata version 12 (StataCorp. LP, College Station, United States of America), which uses an iterative multivariable regression procedure to generate distributions for each variable with missing data that are conditional on all other variables in the imputation models.31 All variables with missing data were imputed using appropriate distributions to model each variable, for example logistic, ordered logistic regressions. A total of 10 imputed data sets were generated. Results were pooled across imputed data sets using Stata’s mi estimate procedures.

Statistical analysis

We estimated the prevalence of suicidal ideation and ideation with a plan among males and females in each country using age-adjusted logistic regression to facilitate comparability of estimates across countries.32 Ratios and differences comparing the prevalence of suicidal behaviours for females compared to males were estimated for each country. Random effects meta-analysis was used to generate regional and overall pooled estimates, using the DerSimonian and Laird inverse-variance method.33 We used meta-regression to correlate country-level estimates of adolescent suicidal ideation with estimated national mortality rates from self-harm among young people aged 15–29 years.2,34

Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) measuring associations between the determinants and suicidal behaviours. RRs were calculated from average marginal probabilities estimated from the logistic coefficients.32 Multivariable models were estimated separately by WHO region and included fixed effects for country and survey year. Population attributable fractions (PAF) were estimated for the risk factors, based on adjusted risk ratios and the prevalence of the determinants within each exposure level.35,36 All analyses incorporated sampling weights where available and accounted for clustering at the school level.

Results

The pooled 12-month prevalence of suicide ideation for females was 16.2% (95% CI: 15.6 to 16.7) and for males 12.2% (95% CI: 11.7 to 12.7). For suicide ideation with a plan the pooled 12-month prevalence for females was 8.3% (95% CI: 7.9 to 8.7) and for males 5.8% (95% CI: 5.5 to 6.1). There was considerable heterogeneity between countries in the prevalence of suicide ideation, ranging from 5.1% (95% CI: 2.1 to 8.1) in Indonesia to 28.1% (95% CI: 22.5 to 33.7) in Zambia. For ideation with a plan for both sexes the prevalence ranged from 1.7% (95% CI: −0.1 to 3.5) in the United Republic of Tanzania to 15.3% (95% CI: 11.6 to 19.0) in Benin and Kenya 15.3% (95% CI: 12.6 to 18.1). The African Region showed the highest overall pooled prevalence of suicide ideation (21.6%; 95% CI: 20.4 to 22.9) and no evidence of gender differences. By contrast, suicide ideation in the Region of the Americas was markedly higher in females than males, with an estimated prevalence ratio of 1.7 (95% CI: 1.6 to 1.8). The South-East Asia Region and Western Pacific Region had a relatively low prevalence of suicidal behaviours for both sexes, 10.7% (95% CI: 9.9 to 11.5) for ideation and 5.0% (95% CI: 4.5 to 5.4) for ideation with a plan (Table 3; available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/5/15-163295).

Table 3. Prevalence of suicide ideation and suicide ideation with a plan by country, 2003–2012.

Country by WHO region Suicide ideation
 Suicide ideation with a plan
Prevalence, % (95% CI)
 Female/male ratio (95% CI) Female/Male Difference (95% CI) Prevalence, % (95% CI)
 Female/Male Ratio (95% CI) Female/Male Difference (95% CI)
Females Males Females Males
African
Benin 21.4 (17.3 to 25.5) 21.7 (17.5 to 25.9) 0.99 (0.86 to 1.12) −0.3 (−3.2 to 2.5) 14.4 (11.1 to 17.8) 15.7(11.7 to 19.7) 0.92 (0.79 to 1.05) −1.3 (−3.5 to 0.9)
Botswana 21.9 (17.9 to 26.0) 19.7 (15.6 to 23.8) 1.11 (0.94 to 1.29) 2.2 (−1.0 to 5.5) 11.4 (8.4 to 17.8) 9.5 (6.4 to 12.7) 1.20 (0.92 to 1.48) 1.9 (−0.4 to 4.3)
Kenya 27.8 (24.4 to 31.2) 27.2 (21.5 to 32.8) 1.02 (0.83 to 1.22) 0.6 (−4.5 to 5.8) 16.0 (12.7 to 19.3) 14.6 (11.8 to 17.5) 1.09 (0.88 to 1.31) 1.3 (−1.7 to 4.4)
Malawi 11.5 (6.8 to 16.3) 9.4 (4.2 to 14.5) 1.23 (0.68 to 1.79) 2.2 (−2.3 to 6.6) 5.9 (2.4 to 9.3) 4.8 (2.5 to 7.2) 1.22 (0.45 to 1.98) 1.0 (−2.4 to 4.5)
Mauritania 19.3 (13.6 to 25.0) 20.1 (13.4 to 26.8) 0.96 (0.72 to 1.20) −0.8 (−5.8 to 4.1) 9.5 (5.4 to 13.5) 11.1 (7.7 to 14.6) 0.85 (0.54 to 1.17) −1.6 (−5.3 to 2.0)
Uganda 23.0 (19.3 to 26.7) 17.7 (13.9 to 21.5) 1.30 (1.06 to 1.54) 5.3 (1.7 to 8.9) 13.6 (10.3 to 17.0) 10.7 (7.3 to 14.0) 1.28 (0.93 to 1.62) 2.9 (−0.2 to 6.1)
United Republic of Tanzania 7.6 (3.1 to 12.1) 8.4 (3.5 to 13.4) 0.90 (0.69 to 1.11) −0.8 (−2.7 to 1.0) 1.7 (−0.0 to 3.5) 1.6 (−0.2 to 3.5) 1.06 (0.70 to 1.41) 0.1 (−0.4 to 0.6)
Zambia 28.2 (22.7 to 33.7) 28 (21.5 to 34.6) 1.01 (0.84 to 1.17) 0.2 (−4.6 to 4.9) 12.6 (8.9 to 16.4) 11.5 (7.5 to 15.5) 1.10 (0.83 to 1.36) 1.1 (−1.7 to 3.9)
Zimbabwe 27.9 (25.1 to 30.6) 25.5 (22.4 to 28.6) 1.09 (0.96 to 1.23) 2.4 (−0.9 to 5.6) 14.4 (12.3 to 16.5) 11.6 (9.3 to 13.9) 1.25 (1.01 to 1.48) 2.8 (0.5 to 5.2)
Region Pooled 22.5 (21.2 to 23.8) 20.1 (18.6 to 21.6) 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10) 0.8 (−0.3 to 1.9) 9.6 (8.7 to 10.5) 8.4 (7.4 to 9.3) 1.05 (0.97 to 1.13) 0.3 (−0.1 to 0.8)
Americas
Argentina 19.7 (14.5 to 24.9) 13.7 (9.4 to 18.0) 1.44 (1.04 to 1.84) 6.0 (1.5 to 10.6) 10.7 (7.1 to 14.4) 7.4 (3.8 to 10.9) 1.45 (0.95 to 1.95) 3.3 (0.5 to 6.2)
Chile 32.1 (26.4 to 37.8) 13.7 (10.4 to 17.0) 2.35 (1.98 to 2.72) 18.4 (14.5 to 22.3) 20.9 (16.5 to 25.3) 7.5 (5.5 to 9.5) 2.79 (2.28 to 3.30) 13.4 (10.2 to 16.6)
Costa Rica 12.6 (9.8 to 15.3) 6.7 (4.5 to 8.9) 1.87 (1.41 to 2.33) 5.8 (3.7 to 8.0) 5.3 (3.2 to 7.4) 3.2 (1.7 to 4.6) 1.68 (1.15 to 2.21) 2.1 (0.7 to 3.6)
Ecuador 23.2 (17.7 to 28.8) 14.4 (11.1 to 17.7) 1.61 (1.33 to 1.89) 8.8 (5.0 to 12.7) 17.1 (12.4 to 21.8) 10.5 (7.8 to 13.2) 1.63 (1.33 to 1.93) 6.6 (3.4 to 9.8)
Guatemala 17.7 (15.2 to 20.1) 10.1 (8.4 to 11.7) 1.75 (1.42 to 2.09) 7.6 (4.9 to 10.3) 12.7 (10.3 to 15.0) 5.9 (4.5 to 7.3) 2.14 (1.63 to 2.66) 6.8 (4.5 to 9.0)
Guyana 24.9 (21.7 to 28.1) 15.0 (12.1 to 18.0) 1.66 (1.35 to 1.96) 9.9 (6.6 to 13.1) 15.9 (13.4 to 18.3) 8.5 (6.3 to 10.7) 1.87 (1.43 to 2.31) 7.4 (4.9 to 9.8)
Peru 27.3 (23.1 to 31.5) 11.9 (9.6 to 14.3) 2.29 (1.92 to 2.66) 15.4 (12.0 to 18.7) 17.6 (14.6 to 20.6) 6.2 (4.8 to 7.7) 2.82 (2.24 to 3.40) 11.3 (8.8 to 13.9)
Trinidad and Tobago 22.8 (18.7 to 26.9) 15.3 (11.5 to 19.1) 1.49 (1.20 to 1.78) 7.5 (4.1 to 10.9) 14.8 (11.6 to 18.0) 9.8 (6.6 to 13.0) 1.50 (1.12 to 1.89) 4.9 (2.2 to 7.7)
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 17.3 (12.0 to 22.5) 12.3 (9.4 to 15.3) 1.40 (1.13 to 1.67) 4.9 (1.4 to 8.4) 12.1 (8.1 to 16.1) 7.4 (4.8 to 10.1) 1.63 (1.17 to 2.08) 4.7 (1.7 to 7.6)
Region Pooled 20.1 (18.9 to 21.3) 11.4 (10.5 to 12.3) 1.70 (1.60 to 1.81) 8.7 (7.7 to 9.8) 12.8 (11.8 to 13.8) 6.4 (5.8 to 7.1) 1.84 (1.69 to 2.00) 5.6 (4.8 to 6.4)
Eastern Mediterranean
Jordan 16.6 (13.8 to 19.4) 13.7 (11.4 to 16.0) 1.21 (0.99 to 1.44) 2.9 (0.1 to 5.7) 10.0 (8.1 to 12.0) 7.2 (5.5 to 8.9) 1.40 (1.06 to 1.74) 2.9 (0.8 to 4.9)
Kuwait 19.0 (16.4 to 21.6) 16.3 (11.7 to 20.9) 1.17 (0.83 to 1.50) 2.7 (−2.1 to 7.6) 10.8 (9.2 to 12.3) 10.0 (6.7 to 13.4) 1.07 (0.72 to 1.43) 0.7 (−2.6 to 4.1)
Lebanon 20.5 (17.4 to 23.5) 15.3 (12.6 to 18.0) 1.34 (1.13 to 1.54) 5.1 (2.5 to 7.8) 12.0 (8.9 to 15.1) 8.7 (6.6 to 13.4) 1.37 (1.04 to 1.70) 3.3 (0.6 to 5.9)
Morocco 20.4 (16.7 to 24.1) 14 (11.5 to 16.6) 1.45 (1.24 to 1.66) 6.3 (3.6 to 9.1) 11.4 (8.9 to 15.1) 7.5 (5.6 to 9.4) 1.53 (1.26 to 1.81) 4.0 (2.2 to 5.7)
Pakistan 7.5 (5.1 to 9.9) 8.3 (6.5 to 10.1) 0.90 (0.61 to 1.19) −0.8 (−3.3 to 1.7) 4.6 (2.1 to 8.1) 4.6 (3.4 to 5.9) 0.99 (0.50 to 1.49) 0.0 (−2.3 to 2.2)
Tunisia 25.8 (21.1 to 30.6) 18.9 (15.2 to 22.6) 1.37 (1.11 to 1.63) 7.0 (2.7 to 11.2) 13.7 (9.7 to 17.6) 10.4 (7.3 to 13.6) 1.31 (0.92 to 1.70) 3.2 (−0.4 to 6.9)
United Arab Emirates 14.0 (11.3 to 16.7) 14.4 (11.5 to 16.6) 0.97 (0.83 to 1.11) −0.4 (−2.4 to 1.6) 7.6 (5.9 to 9.3) 7.5 (6.0 to 9.0) 1.02 (0.83 to 1.21) 0.1 (−1.3 to 1.5)
Region Pooled 16.0 (14.9 to 17.1) 12.9 (12.0 to 13.9) 1.18 (1.10 to 1.26) 2.5 (1.4 to 3.5) 9.5 (8.7 to 10.3) 7.0 (6.3 to 7.6) 1.22 (1.11 to 1.33) 1.8 (1.0 to 2.6)
South-East Asia and Western Pacific
China 17.6 (14.9 to 20.3) 14.0 (11.4 to 16.5) 1.26 (1.11 to 1.41) 3.7 (1.9 to 5.4) 7.1 (5.9 to 8.3) 5.1 (3.9 to 6.2) 1.40 (1.08 to 1.73) 2.0 (0.7 to 3.4)
Indonesia 6.1 (2.4 to 9.8) 4.1 (1.5 to 6.7) 1.50 (0.92 to 2.08) 2.0 (−0.2 to 4.3) 3.5 (1.4 to 5.6) 2.1 (0.7 to 3.5) 1.64 (1.03 to 2.25) 1.4 (0.1 to 2.6)
Malaysia 9.6 (8.4 to 10.7) 6.7 (5.2 to 8.2) 1.43 (1.14 to 1.72) 2.9 (1.4 to 4.3) 4.7 (3.9 to 5.5) 3.3 (2.5 to 4.1) 1.43 (1.06 to 1.79) 1.4 (0.4 to 2.4)
Maldives 17.5 (13.8 to 21.2) 17.2 (13.1 to 21.4) 1.01 (0.83 to 1.20) 0.2 (−2.9 to 3.4) 10.4 (7.3 to 13.5) 9.3 (6.4 to 12.2) 1.12 (0.87 to 1.37) 1.1 (−1.1 to 3.3)
Philippines 23.2 (20.4 to 25.9) 13.9 (11.9 to 16.0) 1.66 (1.45 to 1.87) 9.2 (6.9 to 11.5) 9.4 (7.8 to 11.1) 5.0 (4.1 to 6.0) 1.88 (1.57 to 2.19) 4.4 (3.1 to 5.8)
Sri Lanka 9.9 (6.9 to 12.8) 12 (8.2 to 15.8) 0.82 (0.56 to 1.08) −2.2 (−5.7 to 1.4) 3.9 (1.4 to 6.5) 4.3 (2.0 to 6.7) 0.91 (0.39 to 1.43) −0.4 (−2.7 to 2.0)
Thailand 7.0 (4.1 to 9.9) 8.9 (6.3 to 11.4) 0.78 (0.52 to 1.04) −1.9 (−4.4 to 0.5) 4.2 (1.9 to 6.5) 4.7 (2.5 to 6.8) 0.90 (0.55 to 1.26) −0.4 (−2.1 to 1.2)
Region Pooled 11.7 (10.9 to 12.6) 9.6 (8.7 to 10.5) 1.20 (1.11 to 1.28) 2.7 (1.9 to 5.4) 5.8 (5.3 to 6.4) 4.1 (3.7 to 4.6) 1.32 (1.19 to 1.46) 1.7 (1.2 to 2.2)
All regions
Overall Pooled 16.2 (15.6 to 16.7) 12.2 (11.7 to 12.7) 1.19 (1.16 to 1.23) 3.6 (3.1 to 4.1) 8.3 (7.9 to 8.7) 5.8 (5.5 to 6.1) 1.24 (1.19 to 1.30) 1.7 (1.4 to 2.0)
Open in a new tab

CI: confidence interval; WHO: World Health Organization.

Notes: Pooled estimates are from random effects meta-analysis, for which the inverse-variance DerSimonian and Laird method was used. Inconsistencies arise in some values due to rounding.

Data source: Global School-Based Health Survey.19

Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 summarize the country-specific predicted prevalence estimates of suicide ideation and ideation with a plan for males and females. Approximately half the countries have statistically significant gender inequality. In all countries with gender differences, suicidal behaviours were more common in females than in males. Correlations between youth suicidal ideation and national mortality rates from self-harm were weak to moderate and stronger among males (r = 0.29) than among females (r = 0.11; Fig. 3). Among the eight explored determinants, the highest correlations were between smoking and drinking (r = 0.31) and having been physically attacked and bullied (r = 0.27) and suicide ideation.

Fig. 1.

Prevalence of suicide ideation in the past 12 months among male and female students in WHO regions, 2003–2012

WHO: World Health Organization.

Notes: The dashed diagonal line indicates gender equality in the prevalence of suicidal behaviours. Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the association between male and female prevalence of suicide ideation and ideation with a plan are 0.74 and 0.70, respectively.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Fig. 2.

Prevalence of suicide ideation with a plan in the past 12 months among male and female students in WHO regions, 2003–2012

WHO: World Health Organization.

Notes: The dashed diagonal line indicates gender equality in the prevalence of suicidal behaviours. Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the association between male and female prevalence of suicide ideation and ideation with a plan are 0.74 and 0.70, respectively.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Fig. 3.

Meta-regression plots of the association between suicide ideation and national suicide rates, 2012

CI: confidence interval.

Notes: Mortality rates from self-harm for persons aged 15–29 years for the year 2012 obtained from the World Health Organization Department of Health Statistics and Information Systems. Meta-regression coefficients for males: β = 0.13 (95% CI: −0.03 to 0.30); and females: β = 0.17 (95% CI: −0.42 to 0.76). The size of the bubble represents the precision of the study for each country.

Data source: World Health Organization.34

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Table 4 (available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/5/15-163295) presents adjusted risks and risk ratios for suicide ideation during the past 12 months, stratified by WHO region. With the exception of age, all determinants correlated independently to suicidal ideation in all regions. Moreover, higher RRs were almost always observed for the more extreme categories of the determinants. Determinants of suicide ideation appeared generally consistent across regions, with loneliness, alcohol use and bullying showing stronger associations. Across all regions, the adjusted risk of suicidal ideation among students who answered “mostly/always feeling lonely” was greater than 10 percentage points above those answering “never/rarely feeling lonely,” for example 30.7% versus 20.3% for the African Region and 31.9% versus 12.3% for the Region of the Americas. Analysis for the outcome of suicide ideation with a plan obtained similar results (Table 5; available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/5/15-163295).

Table 4. Risk factors associated with suicide ideation during the past 12 months by WHO region, 2003–2012.

Characteristics African Region
 Region of the Americas
 Eastern Mediterranean Region
 South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions
No. (% in sample) n = 24 789 Riska RR (95% CI)a No. (% in sample) n = 39 204 Riska RR (95% CI)a No. (% in sample) n = 58 348 Riska RR (95% CI)a No. (% in sample)
n = 42 429		 Riska RR (95% CI)a
Sex
Male 12 543 (50.6) 21.0 Ref 19 563 (49.9) 12.5 Ref 30 341 (52.0) 12.5 Ref 21 172 (49.9) 9.9 Ref
Female 12 246 (49.4) 25.0 1.19 (1.12 to 1.26) 19 641 (50.1) 21.3 1.70 (1.59 to 1.82) 28 007 (48.0) 16.7 1.35 (1.27 to 1.44) 21 257 (50.1) 14.2 1.44 (1.34 to 1.55)
Age
< 12 years 1 859 (7.5) 23.0 1.01 (0.86 to 1.15) 5 489 (14.0) 17.2 1.00 (0.91 to 1.10) 5 601 (9.6) 12.5 0.88 (0.79 to 0.97) 3 225 (7.6) 12.5 1.04 (0.90 to 1.18)
13 years 3 644 (14.7) 21.8 0.95 (0.86 to 1.04) 9 644 (24.6) 16.9 0.99 (0.93 to 1.05) 12 253 (21.0) 13.3 0.90 (0.83 to 0.97) 10 310 (24.3) 11.0 0.91 (0.83 to 0.99)
14 years 5 949 (24.0) 22.9 Ref 10 663 (27.2) 17.2 Ref 16 863 (28.9) 14.4 Ref 12 050 (28.4) 12.0 Ref
15 years 6 544 (26.4) 22.7 1.00 (0.93 to 1.07) 8 703 (22.2) 16.5 0.96 (0.89 to 1.03) 15 404 (26.4) 15.0 1.01 (0.93 to 1.09) 9 971 (23.5) 12.0 1.00 (0.92 to 1.08)
16+ years 6 817 (27.5) 23.7 1.04 (0.95 to 1.12) 4 704 (12.0) 16.7 0.97 (0.89 to 1.06) 8 169 (14.0) 16.2 1.11 (1.01 to 1.21) 6 873 (16.2) 12.7 1.06 (0.96 to 1.16)
Attacked in past 12 months
Never 12 543 (50.6) 20.1 Ref 25 953 (66.2) 14.8 Ref 37 051(63.5) 12.9 Ref 28 258 (66.6) 10.6 Ref
Once 4 239 (17.1) 22.9 1.14 (1.03 to 1.25) 5 489 (14.0) 18.8 1.27 (1.16 to 1.38) 8 927 (15.3) 15.3 1.13 (1.03 to 1.22) 5 558 (13.1) 13.0 1.24 (1.11 to 1.36)
≥ 2 times 8 007 (32.3) 26.7 1.33 (1.22 to 1.45) 7 762 (19.8) 21.2 1.43 (1.33 to 1.54) 12 370 (21.2) 17.6 1.35 (1.26 to 1.44) 8 613 (20.3) 14.8 1.41 (1.30 to 1.52)
Bullied in past 30 days
Never 12 419 (50.1) 19.2 Ref 26 384 (67.3) 14.7 Ref 40 318 (69.1) 12.3 Ref 29 191 (68.8) 9.9 Ref
1–2 days 6 346 (25.6) 24.3 1.27 (1.18 to 1.36) 7 214 (18.4) 19.0 1.29 (1.21 to 1.38) 11 028 (18.9) 16.8 1.36 (1.25 to 1.47) 7 934 (18.7) 14.5 1.46 (1.35 to 1.57)
≥ 3 days 6 024 (24.3) 27.8 1.45 (1.35 to 1.54) 5 606 (14.3) 22.0 1.50 (1.39 to 1.61) 7 002 (12.0) 21.3 1.71 (1.56 to 1.86) 5 304 (12.5) 16.4 1.65 (1.50 to 1.80)
Went hungry in past 30 days
Never 9 445 (38.1) 21.4 Ref 25 875 (66.0) 16.6 Ref 35 651 (61.1) 13.8 Ref 20 154 (47.5) 11.2 Ref
Sometimes/rarely 11 973 (48.3) 23.5 1.10 (1.03 to 1.16) 11 879 (30.3) 17.0 1.02 (0.97 to 1.08) 19 547 (33.5) 14.5 1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) 20 239 (47.7) 12.2 1.09 (1.03 to 1.16)
Mostly/always 3 371 (13.6) 24.6 1.15 (1.05 to 1.26) 1 451 (3.7) 19.3 1.16 (1.02 to 1.30) 3 676 (6.3) 17.5 1.23 (1.12 to 1.34) 2 037 (4.8) 15.1 1.35 (1.21 to 1.49)
Number of close friends
Three or more 9 222 (37.2) 21.1 Ref 25 639 (65.4) 15.6 Ref 35 125 (60.2) 12.9 Ref 31 016 (73.1) 11.2 Ref
One or two 12 568 (50.7) 22.9 1.09 (1.02 to 1.15) 10 781 (27.5) 18.0 1.16 (1.09 to 1.22) 19 547 (33.5) 15.5 1.20 (1.12 to 1.28) 9 292 (21.9) 13.0 1.17 (1.09 to 1.25)
None 2 975 (12.09) 28.6 1.36 (1.25 to 1.47) 2 783 (7.1) 22.9 1.47 (1.34 to 1.59) 3 676 (6.3) 22.5 1.73 (1.57 to 1.89) 2 121 (5.0) 15.9 1.42 (1.27 to 1.58)
Lonely in past 12 months
Never/rarely 12 370 (49.9) 20.3 Ref 23 914 (61.0) 12.3 Ref 37 051 (63.5) 11.5 Ref 24 948 (58.8) 9.4 Ref
Sometimes 8 577 (34.6) 22.7 1.12 (1.04 to 1.20) 10 781 (27.5) 17.8 1.45 (1.35 to 1.54) 12 428 (21.3) 14.7 1.30 (1.20 to 1.40) 13 365 (31.5) 12.2 1.30 (1.22 to 1.39)
Mostly/always 4 115 (16.6) 30.7 1.51 (1.39 to 1.63) 4 508 (11.5) 31.9 2.58 (2.40 to 2.77) 8 811 (15.1) 23.2 2.04 (1.90 to 2.18) 4 073 (9.6) 21.9 2.34 (2.12 to 2.55)
Parental understanding
Mostly/always 9 692 (39.1) 20.3 Ref 17 171 (43.8) 13.3 Ref 25 615 (43.9) 11.3 Ref 15 274 (36.0) 9.2 Ref
Sometimes 5 999 (24.2) 22.5 1.11 (1.03 to 1.18) 7 449 (19.0) 15.7 1.18 (1.08 to 1.28) 10 269 (17.6) 13.7 1.22 (1.12 to 1.33) 10 565 (24.9) 10.6 1.16 (1.05 to 1.26)
Never/rarely 9 098 (36.7) 26.0 1.28 (1.19 to 1.37) 14 584 (37.2) 20.8 1.57 (1.47 to 1.67) 22 464 (38.5) 17.8 1.54 (1.44 to 1.64) 16 590 (39.1) 14.7 1.60 (1.48 to 1.72)
Smoking in past 30 days
0 days 22 211 (89.6) 22.0 Ref 32 892 (83.9) 15.6 Ref 52 513 (90.0) 13.4 Ref 38 101 (89.8) 11.4 Ref
1–5 days 1 487 (6.0) 23.5 1.31 (1.15 to 1.48) 3 803 (9.7) 20.4 1.30 (1.17 to 1.44) 3 209 (5.5) 20.6 1.50 (1.34 to 1.66) 2 461 (5.8) 15.8 1.38 (1.24 to 1.52)
≥ 6 days 1 091 (4.4) 24.6 1.39 (1.22 to 1.56) 2 548 (6.5) 24.3 1.56 (1.40 to 1.71) 2 626 (4.5) 22.0 1.61 (1.39 to 1.83) 1 824 (4.3) 15.1 1.32 (1.14 to 1.50)
Drink alcohol in past 30 days
0 days 19 509 (78.7) 21.0 Ref 26 855 (68.5) 14.2 Ref 47 554 (81.5) 13.0 Ref 37 380 (88.1) 10.9 Ref
1–2 days 2 876 (11.6) 27.4 1.31 (1.18 to 1.44) 7 606 (19.4) 20.4 1.44 (1.34 to 1.54) 6 535 (11.2) 18.7 1.39 (1.27 to 1.51) 3 352 (7.9) 16.8 1.54 (1.41 to 1.67)
≥ 3 days 2 380 (9.6) 30.9 1.47 (1.35 to 1.60) 4 744 (12.1) 23.7 1.67 (1.53 to 1.81) 4 259 (7.3) 20.9 1.68 (1.50 to 1.86) 1 697 (4.0) 18.5 1.69 (1.50 to 1.88)
Open in a new tab

CI: confidence interval; Ref: Reference group; RR: Relative risk; WHO: World Health Organization.

a Predicted risks of suicide ideation and RRs were estimated from multivariable logistic regression models that additionally include fixed effects for country and survey year.

Note: Inconsistencies arise in some values due to rounding.

Data source: Global School-Based Health Survey.19

Table 5. Risk factors associated with suicide ideation with a plan during the past 12 months by WHO region, 2003–2012.

Characteristics African Region
 Region of the Americas
 Eastern Mediterranean Region
 South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions
Predicted riska RR (95% CI)a Predicted riska RR (95% CI)a Predicted riska RR (95% CI)a Predicted riska RR (95% CI)a
Sex
Male 9.0 Ref 7.1 Ref 6.9 Ref 3.9 Ref
Female 10.8 1.19 (1.08 to 1.30) 13.3 1.88 (1.72 to 2.04) 9.8 1.42 (1.31 to 1.54) 6.3 1.62 (1.44 to 1.80)
Age, years
< 12 years 9.9 1.03 (0.77 to 1.28) 9.4 0.89 (0.76 to 1.01) 6.8 0.82 (0.70 to 0.93) 5.1 1.01 (0.82 to 1.20)
13 years 9.0 0.93 (0.79 to 1.07) 10.2 0.96 (0.88 to 1.03) 6.9 0.82 (0.73 to 0.91) 4.4 0.89 (0.78 to 0.99)
14 years 9.6 Ref 20.6 Ref 8.4 Ref 5.0 Ref
15 years 9.5 0.99 (0.88 to 1.09) 10.2 0.96 (0.87 to 1.05) 8.7 1.04 (0.94 to 1.15) 5.2 1.03 (0.92 to 1.14)
16+ years 10.7 1.11 (0.98 to 1.23) 10.5 0.99 (0.88 to 1.10) 9.7 1.16 (1.02 to 1.30) 5.4 1.07 (0.93 to 1.21)
Times physically attacked in past 12 months
Never 8.7 Ref 8.8 Ref 7.2 Ref 4.3 Ref
Once 9.7 1.12 (0.98 to 1.26) 11.5 1.30 (1.15 to 1.45) 8.1 1.12 (1.01 to 1.23) 5.3 1.24 (1.05 to 1.44)
≥ 2 times 11.5 1.33 (1.19 to 1.46) 13.0 1.47 (1.32 to 1.62) 10.2 1.41 (1.29 to 1.54) 6.6 1.54 (1.34 to 1.74)
Days bullied in past 30 days
Never 8.5 Ref 8.9 Ref 6.8 Ref 4.1 Ref
1–2 days 10.5 1.23 (1.11 to 1.36) 11.5 1.30 (1.17 to 1.42) 9.1 1.35 (1.19 to 1.50) 5.8 1.42 (1.23 to 1.61)
≥ 3 days 11.3 1.32 (1.19 to 1.45) 13.0 1.47 (1.31 to 1.62) 11.9 1.76 (1.54 to 1.98) 7.1 1.73 (1.51 to 1.96)
Went hungry in past 30 days
Never 9.5 Ref 10.1 Ref 7.9 Ref 4.7 Ref
Sometimes/rarely 10.0 1.04 (0.93 to 1.16) 10.3 1.01 (0.94 to 1.09) 8.0 1.02 (0.93 to 1.10) 5.0 1.07 (0.97 to 1.17)
Mostly/always 10.1 1.06 (0.92 to 1.20) 12.2 1.21 (1.02 to 1.39) 10.3 1.31 (1.15 to 1.46) 6.6 1.40 (1.14 to 1.65)
No. of close friends
Three or more 9.6 Ref 9.6 Ref 7.5 Ref 4.6 Ref
One or two 9.5 0.99 (0.90 to 1.08) 10.5 1.10 (1.01 to 1.18) 8.3 1.09 (1.00 to 1.19) 5.4 1.16 (1.05 to 1.28)
None 12.0 1.24 (1.08 to 1.40) 14.4 1.50 (1.34 to 1.66) 12.8 1.69 (1.48 to 1.90) 7.2 1.56 (1.30 to 1.82)
Times felt lonely in past 12 months
Never/rarely 8.4 Ref 6.9 Ref 6.2 Ref 3.6 Ref
Sometimes 9.8 1.17 (1.05 to 1.28) 10.3 1.49 (1.35 to 1.63) 8.1 1.30 (1.16 to 1.44) 5.1 1.41 (1.25 to 1.58)
Mostly/always 13.5 1.60 (1.42 to 1.78) 20.8 3.00 (2.70 to 3.31) 14.1 2.27 (2.07 to 2.47) 9.9 2.74 (2.36 to 3.11)
Parental understanding
Mostly/always 8.7 Ref 7.9 Ref 6.6 Ref 3.9 Ref
Sometimes 9.7 1.11 (1.00 to 1.23) 9.1 1.15 (1.03 to 1.27) 8.1 1.20 (1.05 to 1.34) 4.1 1.04 (0.90 to 1.19)
Never/rarely 11.3 1.30 (1.16 to 1.43) 12.8 1.62 (1.49 to 1.75) 14.1 1.45 (1.33 to 1.58) 6.2 1.57 (1.40 to 1.74)
Smoked cigarettes in past 30 days
0 days 9.6 Ref 9.3 Ref 7.5 Ref 4.8 Ref
1–5 days 11.5 1.20 (0.97 to 1.42) 12.8 1.38 (1.22 to 1.54) 11.1 1.48 (1.26 to 1.69) 6.9 1.45 (1.22 to 1.67)
≥ 6 days 11.1 1.15 (0.90 to 1.40) 15.2 1.64 (1.44 to 1.84) 10.3 1.80 (1.50 to 2.11) 6.1 1.29 (1.00 to 1.58)
Drank alcohol in past 30 days
0 days  9.1 Ref 8.2 Ref 7.5 Ref 4.4 Ref
1–2 days 12.0 1.33 (1.15 to 1.50) 12.8 1.57 (1.43 to 1.70) 11.1 1.31 (1.13 to 1.49) 7.3 1.67 (1.40 to 1.93)
≥ 3 days
 13.1
 1.45 (1.24 to 1.66)
 14.8
 1.81 (1.61 to 2.01)
 13.5
 1.50 (1.19 to 1.81)
 9.6
 2.18 (1.77 to 2.58)
Open in a new tab

CI: confidence interval; Ref: Reference group; RR: Relative risk; WHO: World Health Organization.

a Predicted risks of suicide ideation (with a plan) and RRs were estimated from multivariable logistic regression models that additionally include fixed effects for country and survey year.

Data source: Global School-Based Health Survey.19

Regional analyses yielded similar results to country-specific analyses, which identified loneliness, bullying, alcohol use and physical attacks as the most consistent risk factors across countries for both suicidal ideation and ideation with a plan. Of the 32 countries, the RRs were significant for bullying and loneliness in 28 countries, for physical attacks in 26 countries and for lack of parental understanding and alcohol use in 25 countries. Associations between going to bed hungry and smoking and suicide ideation were statistically significant in less than half of the countries. Some determinants showed substantial heterogeneity among countries within the same region in the magnitude of the RRs. For example, there was evidence of substantial heterogeneity within regions for the association between loneliness and suicide ideation (heterogeneity P-values < 0.001). By contrast, the association between bullying and suicide ideation was fairly consistent across countries within regions (all heterogeneity P-values > 0.05; country-specific results are available from corresponding author).

PAFs associated with suicide ideation and ideation with a plan across regions are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. PAF estimates were largest for loneliness and parental support, 26.3% and 20.9%, respectively, in the Region of the Americas. The corresponding values were 20.1% and 22.8% in the South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions and 18.8% and 19.9% in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. In the African Region, PAF estimates were largest for bullying at 16.2% and for physical attacks at 12.0%. Estimates in the African Region for loneliness and parental support were also considerable at 11.3% and 11.9%, respectively. The PAF estimate for alcohol use in the Americas was 15.3%, approximately twice as high as for the other regions. The PAF for going to bed hungry was 6.4% in the African Region compared to just 1.3% in the Americas. In general, PAF estimates for suicide ideation with a plan found similar results as for suicide ideation.

Fig. 4.

Population attributable risk percentage for determinants of suicide ideation across WHO regions

AFRO: African Region; AMRO: Region of the Americas; EMRO: Eastern Mediterranean Region; SEARO: South-East Asia Region; WPRO: Western Pacific Region.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Fig. 5.

Population attributable risk percentage for determinants of suicide ideation with a plan across WHO regions

AFRO: African Region; AMRO: Region of the Americas; EMRO: Eastern Mediterranean Region; SEARO: South-East Asia Region; WPRO: Western Pacific Region.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Discussion

Our results confirm that adolescent suicidal behaviours are a common problem in low-income and middle-income countries, with prevalence similar to that seen in Europe and North America. However, we found heterogeneity across countries and regions in the prevalence of adolescent suicidal behaviours and in the magnitude of gender differences, which is consistent with previous research.5 This variation may in part reflect differences in the meaning of suicidal thoughts and normative attitudes towards suicide across diverse cultural, religious and economic settings.37,38 The higher prevalence of suicidal behaviours among adolescents in African countries may be partly explained by high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) prevalence, political instability and food insecurity.27,39 The fact that country-specific estimates of adolescent suicide ideation did not correlate strongly with national estimates of suicide deaths is perhaps not surprising given the lack of reliable vital registration data in most countries and the underreporting and misclassification of suicide deaths, particularly those occurring among young people.2

The gender differences seen in the Region of the Americas were similar in magnitude to gender differences seen in high-income countries9while other regions showed less or no gender disparity. Over the past few decades, Latin America and the Caribbean have made considerable progress reducing gender disparities in school enrolment and labour force participation.40 There is evidence that changes in women’s traditional family roles and an increase in the share of women working may initially lead to higher female suicide rates. As gender roles evolve in work and education, adolescent girls might face additional stressors.41

Studies have shown a strong association between adverse childhood experiences – such as physical and sexual abuse, parental neglect, bullying – and suicidal behaviours during adolescence and adulthood.27,42 Exposure to these adverse experiences may contribute to suicidal ideation through increasing internalizing behaviours, such as shame, feelings of depression and social isolation, that affect the ability to cope with life stressors.42 A longitudinal study from South Africa found a strong and graded association between cumulative exposure to adverse childhood experiences and suicidal behaviour among adolescents aged 10–18 years.27 We find consistency across a large and diverse set of countries in the cross-sectional associations between physical violence, bullying victimization and suicide ideation, suggesting that policy efforts aimed at reducing violence and bullying among school-aged youth may help reduce adolescent suicidal behaviours across low- and middle-income countries. However, as in high-income countries, the environmental and social context underlying acts of bullying and physical violence likely differ across cultures, policy regimes and economic zones. For example, physical violence from school staff is an important contributor to the overall burden of youth violence in some countries,43 whereas in countries with a high burden of HIV/AIDS, bullying may relate to AIDS-orphanhood and AIDS-related stigma.44 Policy approaches will need to consider these local contexts.

Psychological factors such as depression, low self-esteem, hopelessness and weak social relationships are well established correlates of suicidal behaviours among adolescents in high-income countries9,45 and in several low- and middle-income countries.13,46 Although the survey excludes information on common mental disorders, such as depression and generalized anxiety disorder, which are often comorbid with youth suicidal behaviours,2,13 loneliness and social support are important longitudinal predictors of both adolescent depression and suicide ideation.47 Across all regions and nearly all countries in our study, psychosocial symptoms, such as loneliness, having few friends and lacking parental support were related to adolescent suicidal behaviours. For countries in the Region of the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean and South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions, loneliness was the factor most strongly associated with suicide ideation. In the African Region, loneliness was also associated with suicide ideation, but to a lesser extent than in the other regions. Other factors such as bullying, physical attacks and lack of parental control seem to have a stronger influence for suicide ideation in this region.

The strengths of this analysis include the use of standardized measures of suicidal behaviours and risk factors from large number of countries, with most countries having nationally representative samples. In the absence of standardized methods across surveys, cross-national differences in suicidal behaviours and risk factors are more likely to reflect differences in the type of sample, i.e. community-based and school-based, the wording of questions and data collection procedures.4 However, there are several limitations that should be kept in mind when interpreting our results. First, given the cross-sectional nature of the data, we were unable to assess temporal relationships between the factors associated with suicide ideation. There is also limited evidence of the validity and reliability of the survey’s measures across culturally diverse settings. Furthermore, in addition to the sensitive nature of questions about suicide, differences in the willingness of students from different cultural backgrounds to report suicidal behaviours and translation of the questionnaires into different languages may also have affected the results.48 Finally, restriction of the survey to adolescents currently attending school and present on the day of the survey may have also led to some underreporting of suicidal behaviours.13

Here we show similar determinants of adolescent suicidal behaviours across a diverse set of countries, including violence, bullying, lacking friends and alcohol use. Given these risk factors appear quite universal, this information could be used to identify adolescents in school settings who are at increased risk for suicidal thoughts. School-based suicide prevention interventions have been shown to effectively reduce suicide thoughts and attempts among adolescents in rich countries,49,50 however there is a dearth of evidence on effective policies or interventions to reduce youth suicidal behaviours and suicide from low-income and middle-income countries. More research is needed to understand the etiology of suicidal behaviours as well as the types of policies and interventions that can effectively reduce the burden of this critical health challenge.

Competing interests:

None declared.

References

  • 1.Patton GC, Coffey C, Sawyer SM, Viner RM, Haller DM, Bose K, et al. Global patterns of mortality in young people: a systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2009. September 12;374(9693):881–92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60741-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Preventing global suicide: a global imperative [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/suicide-prevention/world_report_2014/en/
  • 3.Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, Cha CB, Kessler RC, Lee S. Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiologic reviews. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. pp. 133–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kokkevi A, Rotsika V, Arapaki A, Richardson C. Adolescents’ self-reported suicide attempts, self-harm thoughts and their correlates across 17 European countries. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012. April;53(4):381–9. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02457.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Page RM, Saumweber J, Hall PC, Crookston BT, West JH. Multi-country, cross-national comparison of youth suicide ideation: Findings from Global School-based Health Surveys. Sch Psychol Int. 2013;34(5):540–55. 10.1177/0143034312469152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scott LN, Pilkonis PA, Hipwell AE, Keenan K, Stepp SD. Non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal ideation as predictors of suicide attempts in adolescent girls: a multi-wave prospective study. Compr Psychiatry. 2015. April;58:1–10. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.12.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grossman DC. Risk and prevention of youth suicide. Pediatr Ann. 1992. July;21(7):448–9, 452–4. 10.3928/0090-4481-19920701-10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Swahn MH, Bossarte RM. Gender, early alcohol use, and suicide ideation and attempts: findings from the 2005 youth risk behavior survey. J Adolesc Health. 2007. August;41(2):175–81. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hawton K, Saunders KE, O’Connor RC. Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. Lancet. 2012. June 23;379(9834):2373–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60322-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mahfoud ZR, Afifi RA, Haddad PH, Dejong J. Prevalence and determinants of suicide ideation among Lebanese adolescents: results of the GSHS Lebanon 2005. J Adolesc. 2011. April;34(2):379–84. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holt MK, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Polanin JR, Holland KM, DeGue S, Matjasko JL, et al. Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015. February;135(2):e496–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brown DW, Riley L, Butchart A, Meddings DR, Kann L, Harvey AP. Exposure to physical and sexual violence and adverse health behaviours in African children: results from the Global School-based Student Health Survey. Bull World Health Organ. 2009. June;87(6):447–55. 10.2471/BLT.07.047423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pillai A, Andrews T, Patel V. Violence, psychological distress and the risk of suicidal behaviour in young people in India. Int J Epidemiol. 2009. April;38(2):459–69. 10.1093/ije/dyn166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Randall JR, Doku D, Wilson ML, Peltzer K. Suicidal behaviour and related risk factors among School-aged youth in the republic of Benin. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wilson ML, Dunlavy AC, Viswanathan B, Bovet P. Suicidal expression among school-attending adolescents in a middle-income sub-Saharan country. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012. November;9(11):4122–34. 10.3390/ijerph9114122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rudatsikira E, Muula AS, Siziya S, Twa-Twa J. Suicidal ideation and associated factors among school-going adolescents in rural Uganda. BMC Psychiatry. 2007;7(1):67. 10.1186/1471-244X-7-67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Beautrais A, et al. Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. Br J Psychiatry. 2008. February;192(2):98–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Suicidal ideation and associated factors among school-going adolescents in Thailand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012. February;9(2):462–73. 10.3390/ijerph9020462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/GSHS/ [cited 2016 Mar 22].
  • 20.Page RM, West JH. Suicide ideation and psychosocial distress in sub-Saharan African youth. Am J Health Behav. 2011. Mar-Apr;35(2):129–41. 10.5993/AJHB.35.2.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Randall JR, Doku D, Wilson ML, Peltzer K. Suicidal behaviour and related risk factors among school-aged youth in the Republic of Benin. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88233–9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ahmad N, Cheong SM, Ibrahim N, Rosman A. Suicidal ideation among Malaysian adolescents. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014. September;26(5) Suppl:63S–9S. 10.1177/1010539514540746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chronic diseases and health promotion. Global school-based student health survey (GSHS) [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/gshs/en/ [cited 2016 Mar 22].
  • 24.Brener ND, Billy JOG, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health. 2003. December;33(6):436–57. 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00052-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Becker AE, Roberts AL, Perloe A, Bainivualiku A, Richards LK, Gilman SE, et al. Youth health-risk behavior assessment in Fiji: the reliability of Global School-based Student Health Survey content adapted for ethnic Fijian girls. Ethn Health. 2010. April;15(2):181–97. 10.1080/13557851003615552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.World development report 2012. Washington: World Bank; 2012. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1315936222006/Complete-Report.pdf , [cited 2016 April 7].
  • 27.Cluver L, Orkin M, Boyes ME, Sherr L. Child and adolescent suicide attempts, suicidal behavior, and adverse childhood experiences in South Africa: A prospective study. J Adolesc Health. 2015. July;57(1):52–9. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu X, Tein J-Y, Zhao Z, Sandler IN. Suicidality and correlates among rural adolescents of China. J Adolesc Health. 2005. December;37(6):443–51. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.08.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mark L, Samm A, Tooding L-M, Sisask M, Aasvee K, Zaborskis A, et al. Suicidal ideation, risk factors, and communication with parents. An HBSC study on school children in Estonia, Lithuania, and Luxembourg. Crisis. 2013. January 1;34(1):3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cash SJ, Bridge JA. Epidemiology of youth suicide and suicidal behavior. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009. October;21(5):613–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.StataCorp. Multiple-imputation reference manual. College Station: Stata Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Muller CJ, MacLehose RF. Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2014. June;43(3):962–70. 10.1093/ije/dyu029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sterne J. Meta-analysis in Stata: an updated collection from the Stata Journal. 1st ed. College Station: Stata Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Health statistics and information systems. Global health estimates [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/ [cited 2016 Mar 22].
  • 35.Miettinen OS. Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol. 1974. May;99(5):325–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rockhill B, Newman B, Weinberg C. Use and misuse of population attributable fractions. Am J Public Health. 1998. January;88(1):15–9. 10.2105/AJPH.88.1.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wasserman D, Wasserman C, editors. Oxford textbook of suicidology and suicide prevention . Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. 10.1093/med/9780198570059.001.0001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Marecek J. Young women's suicides in Sri Lanka: cultural, ecological and psychological factors. Asian J Couns. 2006;13:63–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Swahn MH, Palmier JB, Kasirye R, Yao H. Correlates of suicide ideation and attempt among youth living in the slums of Kampala. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012. February;9(2):596–609. 10.3390/ijerph9020596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.World development indicators 2010. Washington: World Bank; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pampel FC. National context, social change, and sex differences in suicide rates. Am Sociol Rev. 1998;63(5):744-758 10.2307/2657337 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brodsky BS, Stanley B. Adverse childhood experiences and suicidal behavior. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008. June;31(2):223–35. 10.1016/j.psc.2008.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Devries KM, Knight L, Child JC, Mirembe A, Nakuti J, Jones R, et al. The good school toolkit for reducing physical violence from school staff to primary school students: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Uganda. Lancet Glob Health. 2015. July;3(7):e378–86. 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00060-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cluver L, Orkin M. Cumulative risk and AIDS-orphanhood: interactions of stigma, bullying and poverty on child mental health in South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2009. October;69(8):1186–93. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.King RA, Schwab-Stone M, Flisher AJ, Greenwald S, Kramer RA, Goodman SH, et al. Psychosocial and risk behavior correlates of youth suicide attempts and suicidal ideation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001. July;40(7):837–46. 10.1097/00004583-200107000-00019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Page RM, West JH. Suicide ideation and psychosocial distress in sub-Saharan African youth. Am J Health Behav. 2011. Mar-Apr;35(2):129–41. 10.5993/AJHB.35.2.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Qualter P, Brown SL, Munn P, Rotenberg KJ. Childhood loneliness as a predictor of adolescent depressive symptoms: an 8-year longitudinal study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010. June;19(6):493–501. 10.1007/s00787-009-0059-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A, De Leo D, Bolhari J, Botega N, De Silva D, et al. Suicide attempts, plans, and ideation in culturally diverse sites: the WHO SUPRE-MISS community survey. Psychol Med. 2005. October;35(10):1457–65. 10.1017/S0033291705005404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wasserman D, Hoven CW, Wasserman C, Wall M, Eisenberg R, Hadlaczky G, et al. School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015. April 18;385(9977):1536–44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61213-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Aseltine RH Jr, DeMartino R. An outcome evaluation of the SOS suicide prevention program. Am J Public Health. 2004. March;94(3):446–51. 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES