Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 11;16(4):520. doi: 10.3390/s16040520

Table 5.

Comparison with different optimization methods for KELM.

Class Predicted as *
QPSO PSO GA GS
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 20 0 0 0 18 2 0 0 18 2 0 0 17 1 0 2
2 2 18 0 0 3 17 0 0 3 17 0 0 2 18 0 0
3 1 0 18 1 0 0 19 1 0 0 19 1 1 0 17 2
4 0 0 0 20 0 0 3 17 0 0 4 16 1 0 2 17
Total 95.00% 88.75% 87.50% 86.25%