Table 5.
Comparison with different optimization methods for KELM.
| Class | Predicted as * | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QPSO | PSO | GA | GS | |||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 2 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
| Total | 95.00% | 88.75% | 87.50% | 86.25% | ||||||||||||