Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 15;16(4):544. doi: 10.3390/s16040544

Table 2.

Comparison of intra-tissue pressure measurement methodologies and findings in mini-invasive thermal ablation for cancer care.

Pressure Sensor Thermal Ablation Measurement Results
Study Technology Size TA Type Tissue Distance Tip-to-Tip Thermal Error 1 Peak Pressure 2 75% of Peak 3
[16] MEMS diameter 1 cm thickness 3 mm RFA Liver, porcine phantom 30 mm 0.5 kPa/°C 833 kPa 0.94
[17] MEMS diameter 1 cm thickness 3 mm RFA Liver, in vivo on pigs 15 mm 0.5 kPa/°C 9 kPa 0.83
[25] Fiber optic EFPI diameter 0.2 mm RFA Liver, porcine phantom 1 mm; 5 mm 0.03 kPa/°C 162 kPa; 32 kPa 0.93; 0.94
Current study Fiber optic EFPI diameter 0.2 mm LA Liver, porcine phantom 0.5 mm; 1.2 mm 0.03 kPa/°C 71 kPa; 48 kPa 0.24; 0.63

1 Data from [15,16] and sensor datasheet for MEMS; in-lab characterization for EFPI; 2 Values are reported for single-step ablation; 3 Normalized time for which the pressure value is 75% of the peak pressure.