. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Mar 10;40(4):785–793. doi: 10.1111/acer.13011

Table 2.

Generalized Estimating Equations Predicting Binge Drinking for White, Black, and Hispanic current drinkers in the New York Social Environment Survey (N=1,415).

	Full Group Odds Ratio (95% CI) (N_CD = 59)	Whites Odds Ratio (95% CI) (N_CD = 52)	Blacks Odds Ratio (95% CI) (N_CD = 50)	Hispanics Odds Ratio (95% CI) (N_CD = 55)
Individual Acceptance of Drunkenness	2.32 (1.67, 3.22)	3.23 (2.23, 4.68)	1.39 (0.64, 3.01)	1.95 (0.92, 4.14)
Individual Collective Efficacy	0.96 (0.77, 1.19)	0.97 (0.69, 1.36)	0.82 (0.56, 1.21)	0.96 (0.57, 1.63)
Neighborhood Acceptance of Drunkenness	1.22 (1.09, 1.37)	1.20 (1.05, 1.38)	1.11 (0.67, 1.84)	1.18 (0.83, 1.68)
Neighborhood Collective Efficacy	0.89 (0.74, 1.06)	0.75 (0.62, 0.91)	0.89 (0.54, 1.49)	0.95 (0.62, 1.44)
Neighborhood Physical Disorder	0.91 (0.77, 1.06)	0.76 (0.62, 0.93)	1.06 (0.73, 1.56)	0.98 (0.74, 1.29)

Note. Full group model adjusts for age, race, sex, marital status, education and income. Race/ethnicity-specific model adjusts for age, sex, marital status, education and income. CI stands for Confidence Interval. CD stands for Community Districts. Seven community districts did not have any Whites, nine had no Blacks, and four had no Hispanics.