Skip to main content
. 2016 May;357(2):281–292. doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.232637

TABLE 1.

Estimated parameters for CYP26A1 and CYP26B1 homology models

Parameter CYP26A1 Model CYP26B1 Model
Template CYP120 (pdb 2VE3) CYP120 (pdb 2VE3)
Template sequence identity 33% 34%
Template positive sequence coverage 53% 54%
BLAST query coverage 89% 89%
BLAST E-Value 2e-82 6e-91
RMSD versus template 1.038 1.168
Favorable bond angles 86.2% 95.0%
Allowable and favorable bond angles 98.9% 98.3%
I-Helix residues M287–L318 M283–A304
Active-site volume 918.01 Å3 976.86 Å3
at-RA docking score (4-(S)-OH) −9.552 −4.999
at-RA distance from heme (4-(S)-OH) 3.85 Å 2.99 Å
at-RA docking score (4-(R)-OH) N/A −4.128
at-RA distance from heme (4-(R)-OH) N/A 4.06 Å
at-RA docking score (16-OH) −9.552 −4.488
at-RA distance from heme (16-OH) 3.49 Å 2.77 Å
at-RA docking score (18-OH) −9.552 −4.435
at-RA distance from heme (18-OH) 5.10 Å 3.10 Å
Tazarotenic acid docking score −11.016 −9.172
Tazarotenic acid distance from heme 4.21 Å (to sulfur) 4.11 Å (to sulfur)
Tazarotenic acid sulfoxide docking score −11.912 −9.843
Tazarotenic acid sulfoxide distance from heme 4.38 (to sulfur) 3.58 Å (to sulfur)